Cited by 491Climate change and permafrostEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics

Opposing plant community responses to warming with and without herbivores

Open access
Post, Eric, Pedersen, Christian·2008·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

If controls over primary productivity and plant community composition are mainly environmental, as opposed to biological, then global change may result in large-scale alterations in ecosystem structure and function. This view appears to be favored among investigations of plant biomass and community responses to experimental and observed warming. In far northern and arctic ecosystems, such studies predict increasing dominance of woody shrubs with future warming and emphasize the carbon (C)-sequestration potential and consequent atmospheric feedback potential of such responses. In contrast to previous studies, we incorporated natural herbivory by muskoxen and caribou into a 5-year experimental investigation of arctic plant community response to warming. In accordance with other studies, warming increased total community biomass by promoting growth of deciduous shrubs (dwarf birch and gray willow). However, muskoxen and caribou reduced total community biomass response, and responses of birch and willow, to warming by 19%, 46%, and 11%, respectively. Furthermore, under warming alone, the plant community shifted after 5 years away from graminoid-dominated toward dwarf birch-dominated. In contrast, where herbivores grazed, plant community composition on warmed plots did not differ from that on ambient plots after 5 years. These results highlight the potentially important and overlooked influences of vertebrate herbivores on plant community response to warming and emphasize that conservation and management of large herbivores may be an important component of mitigating ecosystem response to climate change.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0802421105

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Post, E., & Pedersen, C.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2008-08-26
Volume
105
Issue
34
Pages
12353-12358
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2005447989
Cited by
491
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 36
FWCI
12.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Geographic Society
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Pennsylvania State University
  • Institutes of Energy and the Environment, Pennsylvania State University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Climate change and permafrost
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Keywords
global warming, floristic composition, herbivory, Ovibos moschatus, reindeer, Arctic tundra, Betula nana, Salix cinerea, shrub expansion, community biomass, carbon sequestration, global change
MeSH terms
Animals, Eating, Greenland, Moths, Plants, Ruminants, Greenhouse Effect, Ecosystem, Plant Physiological Phenomena, Biomass, Plant Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review