The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Plant Litter: Light Interception and Effects on an Old‐Field Plant Community
Abstract
We studied the effects of litter of the annual grass Setaria faberii, the perennial herb Solidago spp. (mostly S. canadensis), and leaves of the hardwood tree Quercus alba on a successional plant community. We also assessed light interception by these litter types in the laboratory. Light extinction followed the Beer—Lambert exponential law. Solidago litter had the highest transmittance constant and Quercus litter the lowest. The three types of litter produced different light mosaics at the microsite (0.8 cm diameter) scale. In the field, all three litter types affected community structure, by the effect of Quercus was the strongest. Litter reduced the density of the two dominant grasses, Setaria faberii and Panicum dichotomiflorum. Quercus and Setaria litter resulted in biomass compensation (i.e., fewer but larger individuals) by S. faberii but not by P. dichotomiflorum, which probably was always outcompeted by S. faberii. Solanum carolinense, the main dicot in the community, was unaffected by litter addition. Setaria and Solidago litter enhanced the establishment of Erigeron annuus, but Quercus litter reduced it. Litter reduced the number of flowering individuals of S. faberii and the number of seeds per plot; Quercus litter increased the production of seeds per individual. We conclude that species—dependent effects of litter on plant populations may significantly alter interspecific interactions and change plant community structure through direct and indirect effects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Plant litter: Its dynamics and effects on plant community structure
Facelli, J. M., & Pickett, S. T. A. (1991) · The Botanical Review · doi:10.1007/bf02858763 · Cited by 1,543
Self-citationMirsky, S. B., Curran, W. S., Mortenseny, D. M., Ryany, M. R., & Shumway, D. L. (2011) · Weed Science · doi:10.1614/ws-d-10-00101.1 · Cited by 217
Metadata
- Authors
- Facelli, J. M., & Pickett, S. T. A.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1991-06
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1024-1031
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W1974183657
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plant Litter: Light Interception and Effects on an Old‐Field Plant Community. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1940602
- The paper
- Facelli, J. M., & Pickett, S. T. A. (1991). Plant Litter: Light Interception and Effects on an Old‐Field Plant Community. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940602
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.