The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Coarse Woody Debris in Douglas‐Fir Forests of Western Oregon and Washington
Abstract
Amounts and structural characteristics of coarse woody debris (CWD) were examined in relation to stand age and site moisture condition in 196 Pseudotsuga menziesii stands in western Oregon and Washington. Stands ranged from 40 to 900 yr old, and most if not all, originated after fire. In a chronosequence from the Cascade range, the amount of CWD followed a U—shaped pattern for stands <500 yr old, with moderate levels (92 Mg/ha) in stands <80 yr old, lowest levels (<50 Mg/ha) in stands 80—120 yr old, and highest levels (173 Mg/ha) in stands 400—500 yr old. After 500 yr the amounts of CWD declined to intermediate levels. In the southern Coast Range, lowest levels (32 Mg/ha) of CWD were in the youngest stands (60—80 yr), primarily because they inherited little CWD from the preceding (prefire) stands. In the Cascade Range, levels of CWD inherited from preceding stands were highest in young stands and declined to near zero by 250 yr. The overall decay rate constant (k) for snags and logs in the Cascade Range, calculated indirectly from the chronosequence, was 0.029 yr—1. Volume and biomass of CWD differed significantly in old—growth stands (>200 yr old) among site moisture classes. Dry sites averaged 72 Mg/ha moderate sites 137 Mg/ha, and moist sites 174 Mg/ha. The dynamics of CWD were modeled for three fire histories, each beginning with an initial fire in an old—growth stand but differing in number and severity of subsequent fires. All three models exhibited low values of CWD between 80 and 200 yr. The lowest and most prolonged minimum in CWD between 80 and 200 yr. The lowest and most prolonged minimum in CWD during succession occurred when additional fires burned early in succession, which probably happened preceding many stands in the southern Coast Range. The results of the study indicate that a steady—state condition in CWD may not be reached for >1000 yr, and that the nature and timing of disturbance play a key role in the dynamics of CWD in the dynamics of CWD in the region.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Effects on Carbon Storage of Conversion of Old-Growth Forests to Young Forests
Harmon, M. E., Ferrell, W. K., & Franklin, J. F. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.247.4943.699 · Cited by 819
Self-citationResponse of the herbaceous layer to natural disturbance in North American forests
Roberts, M. R. (2004) · Canadian Journal of Botany · doi:10.1139/b04-091 · Cited by 326
Welsh, H. H., & Droege, S. (2001) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.015003558.x · Cited by 296
The combustion of sound and rotten coarse woody debris: a review
Hyde, J. C., Smith, A. M. S., Ottmar, R. D., Alvarado, E. C., & Morgan, P. (2011) · International Journal of Wildland Fire · doi:10.1071/wf09113 · Cited by 89
Litter and dead wood dynamics in ponderosa pine forests along a 160-year chronosequence
Hall, S. A., Burke, I. C., & Hobbs, N. T. (2006) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[2344:ladwdi]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Spies, T. A., Franklin, J. F., & Thomas, T. B.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1988-12
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1689-1702
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2100306961
- Cited by
- 648
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coarse Woody Debris in Douglas‐Fir Forests of Western Oregon and Washington. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1941147
- The paper
- Spies, T. A., Franklin, J. F., & Thomas, T. B. (1988). Coarse Woody Debris in Douglas‐Fir Forests of Western Oregon and Washington. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941147
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.