The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Patterns of Nutrient Loss from Unpolluted, Old‐Growth Temperate Forests: Evaluation of Biogeochemical Theory
Abstract
Atmospheric pollution and other human activities have altered natural element cycles over large regions of the world. Much current understanding of nutrient dynamics in temperate region ecosystems has been derived from such biogeochemically altered areas. While it is increasingly difficult to find regions of temperate forest that can be classified as free from human influences, studies of unpolluted and undisturbed areas can (1) provide important °baseline° information about natural patterns of element cycling, against which disturbed cycles can be compared; (2) provide insights into the biogeochemical conditions that acted as evolutionary and selective constraints on biotic communities before the advent of regional—scale human impacts; and (3) provide an opportunity to evaluate the general nature of biogeochemical theories that have been developed in areas subject to strong human influences. We here report on patterns of hydrologic nutrient loss from old—growth temperate forest ecosystems in southern Chile based on chemical analyses of small streams draining 31 watersheds. These forests have not been subject to air pollution inputs and have remained floristically stable throughout the Holocene. For major elements our results support predictions from current biogeochemical theory (the °nutrient retention hypothesis°) that net biotic retention of elements should be minimal in old—growth ecosystems. Despite the dilute nature of watershed streams, the overall patterns of loss of most elements could be explained almost exclusively by atmospheric inputs of marine aerosols. In contrast, patterns of nitrogen loss were more complex than predicted by current conceptual models. Hydrolic N losses occurred nearly exclusively (95% of total N) as dissolved organic forms of nitrogen (DON), rather than as the inorganic forms NO 3 — (0.2% of total N) and NH 4+ (4.8% of total N). The strong dominance of organic over inorganic losses of N indicates that losses of N from old—growth forest ecosystems are not exclusively subject to traditional mechanisms of direct biotic control (i.e., mineralization supply or biotic uptake), but are also subject to indirect biotic control associated with the long—term accumulation, humification, and leaching of soil organic N during ecosystem succession. The view of unpolluted old—growth forests as °leaky° vs. °non—leaky° with respect to N depends on whether ecosystem budgets or models consider dissolved organic, as well as inorganic, forms of N. High— and mid—elevation forests in our study area showed the lowest afflux concentrations of N as NO 3 — reported from any Old—growth temperate forest ecosystem (0.l0 vs. 0.30 mg/L, respectively). Comparisons against other old—growth forests, subject to varying levels of N deposition, indicated that levels of NO 3— and the relative abundance of NO 3— vs. NH 4+ in Northern Hemisphere forests may be strongly influenced by atmospheric N inputs. Our analyses suggest that patterns of N cycling, as well as evolutionary selective pressures on plant and microbial species, may have changed as a function of regional scale increases in atmospheric N deposition to European and North American temperate forests. We hypothesize that, because they inherently are more poor than aggrading forests at retaining added nutrients, old—growth forest ecosystems are particularly sensitive indicators of N deposition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McKnight, D. M., Bencala, K. E., Zellweger, G. W., Aiken, G. R., Feder, G. L., & Thorn, K. A. (1992) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es00031a017 · Cited by 405
Cited by
Nitrogen cycles: Past, present, and future
Galloway, J. N., Dentener, F. J., Capone, D. G., Boyer, E. W., Howarth, R. W., Seitzinger, S. P., Asner, G. P., Cleveland, C. C., Green, P. A., Holland, E. A., et al. (2004) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1007/s10533-004-0370-0 · Cited by 5,315
Terrestrial phosphorus limitation: mechanisms, implications, and nitrogen–phosphorus interactions
Vitousek, P. M., Porder, S., Houlton, B. Z., & Chadwick, O. A. (2010) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/08-0127.1 · Cited by 2,729
Fenn, M. E., Poth, M. A., Aber, J. D., Baron, J. S., Bormann, B. T., Johnson, D. W., Lemly, A. D., McNulty, S. G., Ryan, D. F., & Stottlemyer, R. (1998) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0706:neinae]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 788
Dissolved Organic Carbon in Terrestrial Ecosystems: Synthesis and a Model
Neff, J. C., & Asner, G. P. (2001) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s100210000058 · Cited by 734
Dynamics of soil nitrogen and carbon accumulation for 61 years after agricultural abandonment
Knops, J. M. H., & Tilman, D. (2000) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[0088:dosnac]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 595
Metadata
- Authors
- Hedin, L. O., Armesto, J. J., & Johnson, A. H.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-03
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 493-509
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2087455254
- Cited by
- 682
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patterns of Nutrient Loss from Unpolluted, Old‐Growth Temperate Forests: Evaluation of Biogeochemical Theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1941208
- The paper
- Hedin, L. O., Armesto, J. J., & Johnson, A. H. (1995). Patterns of Nutrient Loss from Unpolluted, Old‐Growth Temperate Forests: Evaluation of Biogeochemical Theory. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941208
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.