The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pattern of Self‐Thinning in Jack Pine: Testing the Random Mortality Hypothesis
Abstract
Spatial statistics were used to examine the pattern of self—thinning in a 0.25—ha even—aged (65 yr old), pure stand of jack pine in the boreal forest near Elk Lake, Ontario, Canada. The positions of 459 living and 916 dead trees were recorded and refined nearest neighbor analysis [G(W)] and second—order spatial statistics [L(t)] were used to examine distributional deviations from both the Poisson expectation and the hypothesis of random mortality. The results indicate that the initial (live + dead, n = 1375) distribution was locally random. By contrast, the distribution of live trees was locally highly regular, while the dead trees were significantly more clumped than random mortality would dictate. It is suggested that the development of a strong regular pattern in the survivors is attributable to differential mortality involving two distinct competitive phases: an early scramble phase involving two—sided competition for soil resources, and a lager contest phase involving one—sided competition for light. Analysis of L(t) for the live trees indicated a mean "area of influence" for each individual of an °3.5 m radius, suggesting that trees may compete directly only with their immediate neighbor.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Harper, J. L. (1977) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 9,128
Distance to Nearest Neighbor as a Measure of Spatial Relationships in Populations
Clark, P. J., & Evans, F. C. (1954) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1931034 · Cited by 3,837
Statistical analysis of spatial point patterns
(1986) · Environmental Software · doi:10.1016/0266-9838(86)90012-2 · Cited by 2,934
The second-order analysis of stationary point processes
Ripley, B. D. (1976) · Journal of Applied Probability · doi:10.2307/3212829 · Cited by 1,539
Size Variability and Competition in Plant Monocultures
Weiner, J., & Thomas, S. C. (1986) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3566048 · Cited by 724
The Ecological and Genetic Consequences of Density-Dependent Regulation in Plants
Antonovics, J., & Levin, D. A. (1980) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.11.110180.002211 · Cited by 492
A Reevaluation of the ‐3/2 Power Rule of Plant Self‐Thinning
Weller, D. E. (1987) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/1942637 · Cited by 455
Second‐Order Neighborhood Analysis of Mapped Point Patterns
Getis, A., & Franklin, J. (1987) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1938452 · Cited by 364
Neighborhood Models of Plant Population Dynamics. I. Single-Species Models of Annuals
Pacala, S. W., & Silander, J. A. (1985) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284349 · Cited by 322
Spatial Data Analysis by Example: Volume 1: Point Pattern and Quantitative Data
Cressie, N., Upton, G., & Fingleton, B. (1987) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1269891 · Cited by 259
Cited by
Rings, circles and null models for point pattern analysis in ecology.
Wiegand, T., & A. Moloney, K. (2004) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12497.x · Cited by 1,157
SPECIES DIVERSITY PATTERNS DERIVED FROM SPECIES–AREA MODELS
He, F., & Legendre, P. (2002) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1185:sdpdfs]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 369
Martens, S. N., Breshears, D. D., Meyer, C. W., & Barnes, F. J. (1997) · Journal of Vegetation Science · doi:10.2307/3237370 · Cited by 101
Korb, J., & Linsenmair, K. E. (2001) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s004420000597 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Kenkel, N. C.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1988-08
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1017-1024
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2003468143
- Cited by
- 522
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 6.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pattern of Self‐Thinning in Jack Pine: Testing the Random Mortality Hypothesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1941257
- The paper
- Kenkel, N. C. (1988). Pattern of Self‐Thinning in Jack Pine: Testing the Random Mortality Hypothesis. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941257
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.