The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Root Communication Mechanisms and Intracommunity Distributions of Two Mojave Desert Shrubs
Abstract
Experimental studies using root observation chambers to observe the effects of encounters between individual roots on root elongation rates have revealed that the interactions among roots of Ambrosia dumosa and Larrea tridentata are more complex than simple competition for a limiting resource. Larrea roots inhibited elongation of either Larrea or Ambrosia roots in their vicinity, and Ambrosia roots inhibited elongation of contacted roots on other Ambrosia plants only. The purpose of the study reported here was to test the hypothesized involvement of inhibitory substances released by roots in these interroot encounters by attempting to remove such substances by adsorption to activated carbon. The presence of activity carbon caused a significant decrease in the inhibition of elongation of neighboring roots by Larrea roots, but activated carbon had no effect on the intraspecific responses of Ambrosia roots. These results support the hypotheses that the interaction mechanism of Larrea roots involves the release of a readily diffusible, generally inhibitory substance by Larrea roots into the soil, rather than a simple depletion of water or nutrients from around Larrea roots, and that the intraspecific, self—nonselfish—recognizing interaction mechanism of Ambrosia roots is mediated by contact and is fundamentally different from that of Larrea. These findings may enhance our understanding of Mojave desert community structure. The root—mediated allelopathy of Larrea may play a role in producing and maintaining the commonly occurring, regular distributions of Larrea. The complex communication mechanism of Ambrosia roots appears to constitute a detection and avoidance system that may allow this shrub to grow in clumped intraspecific distributions with little or no intraspecific competition for water. The interspecific interference between Larrea and Ambrosia in the field may be mechanistically asymmetrical due to their different root communication mechanisms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biochar effects on soil biota – A review
Lehmann, J., Rillig, M. C., Thies, J., Masiello, C. A., Hockaday, W. C., & Crowley, D. (2011) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.04.022 · Cited by 5,074
Invasive Plants Versus Their New and Old Neighbors: A Mechanism for Exotic Invasion
Callaway, R. M., & Aschehoug, E. T. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5491.521 · Cited by 1,454
Self-citationRoot competition: beyond resource depletion
SCHENK, H. J. (2006) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01124.x · Cited by 587
Experimental designs for the study of allelopathy
Inderjit, & Callaway, R. M. (2003) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1026242418333 · Cited by 314
Self-citationEffect of allelopathy on plant performance: a meta‐analysis
Zhang, Z., Liu, Y., Yuan, L., Weber, E., & van Kleunen, M. (2021) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.13627 · Cited by 303
Metadata
- Authors
- Mahall, B. E., & Callaway, R. M.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-12
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2145-2151
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2088408586
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Root Communication Mechanisms and Intracommunity Distributions of Two Mojave Desert Shrubs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1941462
- The paper
- Mahall, B. E., & Callaway, R. M. (1992). Root Communication Mechanisms and Intracommunity Distributions of Two Mojave Desert Shrubs. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941462
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.