The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Food, Predation Risk, and Microhabitat Selection in a Marsh Fish Assemblage
Abstract
Fishes moving onto the surface of a tidal freshwater marsh from an adjacent stream were sampled with flume nets in spring through autumn for 2 yr. Significantly higher numbers were found at sites adjacent to shallow—sloped depositional banks than at sites adjacent to deeper, steeper sloped erosional banks of the stream. Marsh surface features appeared similar, so explanations for this apparent habitat selection were sought in the subtidal portion of the stream. To determine whether the relative abundance of benthic invertebrate prey differed in the two environments, litter bags were placed in the subtidal for 4 wk. Despite higher numbers of invertebrates in erosional zones, both the wet biomass per sample and the mean wet biomass per organism were significantly greater in depositional sites. To test the hypothesis that invertebrate food is more available to fishes in the depositional subtidal, banded killifish (Fundulus diaphanus) were placed in feeding enclosures in both depositional and erosional subtidal habitats in two streams. These fish obtained significantly more food in the shallow depositional subtidal. To test the hypothesis that predation pressure differs with subtidal geomorphology, mummichogs (Fundulus heteroclitus) were tethered on the first half of the rising tide in both depositional and erosional environments in three creeks. Significantly more mummichogs disappeared from tethers and were presumed taken on erosional banks. We conclude that two mechanisms operate in the stream subtidal to give rise to the greater fish abundance at marsh surface sites adjacent to depositional areas. At low tide, when small fishes are confined to creek channels, they select shallow depositional habitats where (1) the availability of benthic invertebrate prey is greatest and (2) predator pressure is less. As the tide rises and inundates the marsh surface, these small fishes seek shelter on the marsh surface adjacent to their preferred low—tide refuge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
ECOLOGICAL PROCESSES UNDERLYING ONTOGENETIC HABITAT SHIFTS IN A CORAL REEF FISH
Dahlgren, C. P., & Eggleston, D. B. (2000) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[2227:epuohs]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 441
Whitfield, A. K. (2017) · Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries · doi:10.1007/s11160-016-9454-x · Cited by 420
Occupation of submerged aquatic vegetation by fishes: testing the roles of food and refuge
Rozas, L. P., & Odum, W. E. (1988) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00380932 · Cited by 362
Self-citationUsing winter flounder growth rates to assess habitat quality in Rhode Island’s coastal lagoons
Meng, L., Gray, C., Taplin, B., & Kupcha, E. (2000) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps201287 · Cited by 81
Bottom, D. L., Baptista, A., Burke, J., Campbell, L., Casillas, E., Hinton, S., Jay, D. A., Lott, M. A., McCabe, G., & McNatt, R. (2011) · doi:10.21236/ada581333 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- McIvor, C. C., & Odum, W. E.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1988-10
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1341-1351
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2057906142
- Cited by
- 318
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Food, Predation Risk, and Microhabitat Selection in a Marsh Fish Assemblage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1941632
- The paper
- McIvor, C. C., & Odum, W. E. (1988). Food, Predation Risk, and Microhabitat Selection in a Marsh Fish Assemblage. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941632
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.