Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 318

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Food, Predation Risk, and Microhabitat Selection in a Marsh Fish Assemblage

McIvor, Carole C., Odum, William E.·1988·Ecology

Abstract

Fishes moving onto the surface of a tidal freshwater marsh from an adjacent stream were sampled with flume nets in spring through autumn for 2 yr. Significantly higher numbers were found at sites adjacent to shallow—sloped depositional banks than at sites adjacent to deeper, steeper sloped erosional banks of the stream. Marsh surface features appeared similar, so explanations for this apparent habitat selection were sought in the subtidal portion of the stream. To determine whether the relative abundance of benthic invertebrate prey differed in the two environments, litter bags were placed in the subtidal for 4 wk. Despite higher numbers of invertebrates in erosional zones, both the wet biomass per sample and the mean wet biomass per organism were significantly greater in depositional sites. To test the hypothesis that invertebrate food is more available to fishes in the depositional subtidal, banded killifish (Fundulus diaphanus) were placed in feeding enclosures in both depositional and erosional subtidal habitats in two streams. These fish obtained significantly more food in the shallow depositional subtidal. To test the hypothesis that predation pressure differs with subtidal geomorphology, mummichogs (Fundulus heteroclitus) were tethered on the first half of the rising tide in both depositional and erosional environments in three creeks. Significantly more mummichogs disappeared from tethers and were presumed taken on erosional banks. We conclude that two mechanisms operate in the stream subtidal to give rise to the greater fish abundance at marsh surface sites adjacent to depositional areas. At low tide, when small fishes are confined to creek channels, they select shallow depositional habitats where (1) the availability of benthic invertebrate prey is greatest and (2) predator pressure is less. As the tide rises and inundates the marsh surface, these small fishes seek shelter on the marsh surface adjacent to their preferred low—tide refuge.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1941632

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 318

Metadata

Authors
McIvor, C. C., & Odum, W. E.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1988-10
Volume
69
Issue
5
Pages
1341-1351
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W2057906142
Cited by
318
References
0
FWCI
8.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Food, Predation Risk, and Microhabitat Selection in a Marsh Fish Assemblage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1941632
The paper
McIvor, C. C., & Odum, W. E. (1988). Food, Predation Risk, and Microhabitat Selection in a Marsh Fish Assemblage. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941632

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.