Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 357

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spatial Variability in a Successional Plant Community: Patterns of Nitrogen Availability

Robertson, G. Philip, Hutson, Michael A., Evans, Francis C., Tiedje, James M.·1988·Ecology

Abstract

We examined the spatial variability of N mineralization, nitrification, and denitrification at a resolution of 1 m over a 0.5—ha portion of an old field in southeast Michigan. Net mineralization and nitrification rates were estimated from changes in ammonium and nitrate during 45—d laboratory incubations of soil from >300 individual sample locations. Denitrification was estimated from nitrous oxide accumulation rates during 24—h incubations of intact cores (n = 252) under acetylene atmospheres at a pressure of 10 kPa. We used geostatistical procedures to characterize the spatial distributions of these and other soil variates. Semivariograms for all three N transformations showed a high degree of spatial dependence among points sampled within 1—40 m of one another. Nugget variances were 27—37% of structural variances, indicating that most of the variation within the sample populations for these rates could be attributed to spatial autocorrelation at a scale >1 m. Isopleths calculated using punctual kriging algorithms show a nonuniform distribution of these transformations across the field. High rates of all processes occurred in swales on the northern edge of the sample area, but also occurred elsewhere in the field on drier, more level sites. These results indicate that spatial characteristics of the measured nitrogen transformations in this old field are complex, and that only some of this complexity is associated with surface topography. Whether spatial complexity affects or mainly reflects plant community structure is not known, but this small—scale heterogeneity may influence existing plant and microbial population dynamics and should be considered by those attempting to understand community dynamics or to quantify ecosystem—level nutrient fluxes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1941649

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 357

Metadata

Authors
Robertson, G. P., Hutson, M. A., Evans, F. C., & Tiedje, J. M.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1988-10
Volume
69
Issue
5
Pages
1517-1524
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W2061805033
Cited by
357
References
1
FWCI
16.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spatial Variability in a Successional Plant Community: Patterns of Nitrogen Availability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1941649
The paper
Robertson, G. P., Hutson, M. A., Evans, F. C., & Tiedje, J. M. (1988). Spatial Variability in a Successional Plant Community: Patterns of Nitrogen Availability. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941649

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.