Cited by 312Fire effects on ecosystemsRangeland and Wildlife ManagementWildlife Ecology and Conservation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Aspen, Elk, and Fire in Northern Yellowstone Park

Romme, William H., Turner, Monica G., Wallace, Linda L., Walker, Jennifer S.·1995·Ecology

Abstract

Most stands of trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides) in northern Yellowstone National Park appear to have become established between 1870 and 1890, with little regeneration since 1900. There has been controversy throughout this century regarding the relative roles of browsing by elk (Cervus elaphus) and fire suppression in preventing aspen regeneration. Fires in 1988 burned 22% of the northern ungulate winter range in the park, and created an unusual opportunity to investigate interactions between fire, ungulate browsing, and aspen regeneration. We tested two hypotheses. (1) The fires would stimulate such prolific sprouting of new aspen stems in burned stands that many stems would escape ungulate browsing and regenerate a canopy of large aspen stems. (2) Browsing pressure would be so intense that it would inhibit aspen canopy regeneration in the burned stands, despite prolific sprouting, but increased forage production in the burned areas would attract elk so that they would not seek out remote aspen stands, and hence, aspen regeneration would occur in unburned aspen stands remote from the burned areas. We sampled aspen sprout density, height, growth form, and browsing intensity in six burned aspen stands six unburned stands close ( 4 km) from the burned area. Density of sprouts was generally greater in the burned stands than in the unburned stands in spring 1990 (2 yr after the fires), but was approaching the density of unburned stands by fall 1991. There were no significant…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1941684

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 31 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–311 of 311

Metadata

Authors
Romme, W. H., Turner, M. G., Wallace, L. L., & Walker, J. S.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-10
Volume
76
Issue
7
Pages
2097-2106
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W2170563059
Cited by
312
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 14
FWCI
5.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
Populus tremuloides, elk browsing, fire suppression, aspen regeneration, 1988 Yellowstone fires, predator-prey interactions, wolf predation, Yellowstone National Park, forage production, sprout growth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review