The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Current Velocity and Its Effect on Aquatic Macrophytes in Flowing Waters
Abstract
Current velocity significantly affected the biomass and shoot density of aquatic macrophytes in two slow—flowing rivers in western Canada. Studies of aquatic macrophyte communities at three sites on the Bow River, Alberta, Canada, between 1982 and 1985 showed that biomass decreased with increasing current velocity within the weed bed over the range 0.01—1 m/s; at current speeds in excess of 1 m/s, aquatic macrophytes were rare. Transplant experiments in which Potamogeton pectinatus was grown in pails containing three sediments differing in texture at three sites with different current velocities also demonstrated that biomass and shoot density were affected by both the direct effects of current velocity on plant shoots and its indirect effects on sediment nutrient concentrations. These results indicate that current velocity is an important factor regulating aquatic macrophyte biomass in flowing waters and suggest that even a relatively modest increase in current velocity within weed beds reduces the abundance of submerged aquatic plants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Basic Principles and Ecological Consequences of Altered Flow Regimes for Aquatic Biodiversity
BUNN, S. E., & ARTHINGTON, A. H. (2002) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-002-2737-0 · Cited by 3,379
Nilsson, C., Lepori, F., Malmqvist, B., Törnlund, E., Hjerdt, N., Helfield, J. M., Palm, D., Östergren, J., Jansson, R., Brännäs, E., et al. (2005) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s10021-005-0030-9 · Cited by 187
Models of aquatic plant productivity: a review of the factors that influence growth
Carr, G. M., Duthie, H. C., & Taylor, W. D. (1997) · Aquatic Botany · doi:10.1016/s0304-3770(97)00071-5 · Cited by 185
Effective River Restoration in the 21st Century
Friberg, N., Angelopoulos, N. V., Buijse, A. D., Cowx, I. G., Kail, J., Moe, T. F., Moir, H., O’Hare, M. T., Verdonschot, P. F. M., & Wolter, C. (2016) · Advances in Ecological Research · doi:10.1016/bs.aecr.2016.08.010 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Chambers, P. A., Prepas, E. E., Hamilton, H. R., & Bothwell, M. L.
- Venue
- Ecological Applications
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1991-08
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 249-257
- ISSN
- 1051-0761 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5582
- OpenAlex
- W2113419135
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Current Velocity and Its Effect on Aquatic Macrophytes in Flowing Waters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1941754
- The paper
- Chambers, P. A., Prepas, E. E., Hamilton, H. R., & Bothwell, M. L. (1991). Current Velocity and Its Effect on Aquatic Macrophytes in Flowing Waters. Ecological Applications. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941754
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.