The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Testing Forest‐BGC Ecosystem Process Simulations Across a Climatic Gradient in Oregon
Abstract
Field measurements from the Oregon Transect Ecological Research project (OTTER) were used to validate selected process simulations in the FOREST—BGC ecosystem model. Certain hydrologic, carbon, and nitrogen cycle process simulations were tested in this validation, either comparatively across sites, or seasonally at single sites. The range of simulated ecosystem—process rates across the OTTER sites was large; annual evapotranspiration (ET) ranged from 15 to 82 cm, net photosynthesis (as carbon) from 2.2 to 22.8 Mg/ha, and decomposition (as carbon) from 1.0 to 7.2 Mg°ha—1°yr—1. High correlations between predicted and measured data were found for: aboveground net primary production, R 2 = 0.82; 100—yr stem biomass, R 2 = 0.79; and average leaf nitrogen concentration, R 2 = 0.88. However, correlations for pre—dawn leaf water potential and equilibrium leaf area index (LAI) were much lower, because successful simulation of these variables requires accurate data for soil water—holding capacity. Defining the water—holding capacity of the rooting zone and the maximum surface conductance for photosynthesis and transpiration rates proved to be critical system variables that defied routine field measurement. Although many other processes are simulated in FOREST—BGC, no other processes had repeated field data sets for validations. Problems in parameterizing the model from disparate data sets are also evaluated, with suggestions for using ecosystem modeling in future integrated research programs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Morales, P., Sykes, M. T., Prentice, I. C., Smith, P., Smith, B., Bugmann, H., Zierl, B., Friedlingstein, P., Viovy, N., Sabaté, S., et al. (2005) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.01036.x · Cited by 287
Ochoa, V., & Urbina-Cardona, N. (2017) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.06.011 · Cited by 149
HUANG, J., ABT, B., KINDERMANN, G., & GHOSH, S. (2011) · Natural Resource Modeling · doi:10.1111/j.1939-7445.2011.00098.x · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Running, S. W.
- Venue
- Ecological Applications
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-05
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 238-247
- ISSN
- 1051-0761 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5582
- OpenAlex
- W2315816144
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Testing Forest‐BGC Ecosystem Process Simulations Across a Climatic Gradient in Oregon. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1941930
- The paper
- Running, S. W. (1994). Testing Forest‐BGC Ecosystem Process Simulations Across a Climatic Gradient in Oregon. Ecological Applications. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941930
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.