Cited by 149Land Use and Ecosystem ServicesSustainability and Ecological Systems AnalysisConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management

Tools for spatially modeling ecosystem services: publication trends, conceptual reflections and future challenges

Ochoa, Vivian, Urbina-Cardona, Nicolás·2017·Ecosystem Services

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.06.011

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ochoa, V., & Urbina-Cardona, N.
Affiliations
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana (CO)
Corresponding author
Ochoa, Vivian
Venue
Ecosystem Services
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-08
Volume
26
Pages
155-169
ISSN
2212-0416 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2733177031
Cited by
149
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 1
FWCI
8.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ecosystem Services (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Keywords
spatial modeling, modeling tools, SWAT, InVEST, model validation, hydrological services, water supply, climate regulation, soil formation, publication trends, model uncertainty, decision support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review