Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 358

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Populations and Local Extinctions of Birds on Barro Colorado Island, Panama

Willis, Edwin O.·1974·Ecological Monographs

Abstract

A 1960—71 study of populations of color—banded ant—following antbirds of three species on a tropical—forested lowland reserve, Barro Colorado Island, showed that the small species (Spotted Antbird, Hylophylax naevioides) remained stable at about 20 pairs/km 2. A medium—sized species, the Bicolored Antbird (Gymnopithys bicolor), decreased from about 3 pairs to 1.5 pairs/km 2. A large species, the Ocellated Antbird (Phaenostictus mcleannani), declined from 1.5 pairs/km 2 to near extinction–only one female remained in early 1971. Two of three other species that regularly follow army ants showed relatively stable populations, but a third large species (Barred Woodcreeper, Dendrocolaptes certhia) declined from two pairs to local extinction. Prior to 1960 a very large ground—cuckoo that follows ants had already become extinct there. Thus, the three largest of the seven original species that regularly followed ants were gone or nearly gone by 1970. The decrease in numbers of regular ant—following birds was not made up by increases in occasional followers. Detailed studies of antbirds showed no clear reasons for declines, except that annual mortalities of adults were high in Ocellated Antbirds (about 30%) compared to Spotted Antbirds (15%—17%) and nest losses perhaps higher in the former (96% compared to 91%). Nest mortalities were slightly lower (88%) and adult mortalities intermediate (about 25%) in Bicolored Antbirds. Female Ocellated Antbirds had higher mortalities than males. The antbirds renest repeatedly during long nesting seasons, up to 14 times per year for Ocellated Antbirds. However, to replace females of this species under Barro Colorado conditions 19 nestings per year would be needed. Concurrent listing of all birds of the island showed that 45 species of breeding birds, 22% of the avifauna present when the island was made a reserve, had disappeared by 1970. No new species replaced them. Of the lost species 13 are forest birds, in danger if forests are cut elsewhere. The other species, second—growth and forest—edge birds, have been crowded out by growth of the forest. Loss of species from this tropical reserve, especially the part apparently caused by the small size and isolation of the reserve, poses problems for conservation and ecological studies of tropical biotas. It is suggested that large future reserves have corridor zones to each other, that is, that intensive human use not preempt too much area nor interrupt immigration of animals or plants from one refuge to another.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1942309

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Willis, E. O.
Venue
Ecological Monographs
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1974-03
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
153-169
ISSN
  • 0012-9615 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7015
OpenAlex
W2092403998
Cited by
358
References
0
FWCI
16.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Populations and Local Extinctions of Birds on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1942309
The paper
Willis, E. O. (1974). Populations and Local Extinctions of Birds on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Ecological Monographs. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942309

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.