The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structure and Function of Successional Vascular Plant Communities in Central New York
Abstract
Succession of vascular plant communities was studied on fields in central New York abandoned for the previous 4 to 36 yr. Changes within fields as they aged were consistent with the overall pattern of change between fields. Over the period covered, Phleum pratense was replaced successively as the major species by Solidago altissima, Picris hieracioides, and Cornus racemosa. Succession was accompanied by increased biological diversity, reduced dominance, decreased energy flow per unit biomass, and increased stability to a pulse perturbation of inorganic nutrients. Although soil phosphorus is an important factor influencing community function on the fields studied, the fertilization experiment indicated a fundamental reorganization of community relationships during succession which reduces community responsiveness to fluctuations in soil nutrients. Increased diversity resulted from the partitioning of constant density and net productivity among increasing numbers of species. Accompanying the increase in diversity was decreasing seasonal synchrony of resource demands among the constituent species pool. Although successional stages could be arbitrarily recognized by the taxonomic identification and growth forms of dominant species, there was a gradual and continuous change in structural and functional properties of the plant community, and no objectively definable stages could be delimited. These studies indicate that a failure to determine productivities of individual species may seriously distort the evaluation of community properties.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An introduction to cybernetics
Ashby, W. R. (1956) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.5851 · Cited by 7,578
The theory of open systems in physics and biology
von Bertalanffy, L. (1950) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.111.2872.23 · Cited by 1,714
Cited by
Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects
Grime, J. P. (1998) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2745.1998.00306.x · Cited by 3,019
PLANT FUNCTIONAL MARKERS CAPTURE ECOSYSTEM PROPERTIES DURING SECONDARY SUCCESSION
Garnier, E., Cortez, J., Billès, G., Navas, M.-L., Roumet, C., Debussche, M., Laurent, G., Blanchard, A., Aubry, D., Bellmann, A., et al. (2004) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/03-0799 · Cited by 2,313
Plant litter: Its dynamics and effects on plant community structure
Facelli, J. M., & Pickett, S. T. A. (1991) · The Botanical Review · doi:10.1007/bf02858763 · Cited by 1,543
Ecology of a Grazing Ecosystem: The Serengeti
McNaughton, S. J. (1985) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/1942578 · Cited by 1,367
Self-citationThe Resource-Ratio Hypothesis of Plant Succession
Tilman, D. (1985) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284382 · Cited by 1,050
Metadata
- Authors
- Mellinger, M. V., & McNaughton, S. J.
- Venue
- Ecological Monographs
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1975-03
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 161-182
- ISSN
- 0012-9615 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7015
- OpenAlex
- W2032881078
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structure and Function of Successional Vascular Plant Communities in Central New York. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1942405
- The paper
- Mellinger, M. V., & McNaughton, S. J. (1975). Structure and Function of Successional Vascular Plant Communities in Central New York. Ecological Monographs. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942405
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.