Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 649

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Partitioning Herbivory and Its Effects on Coral Reef Algal Communities

Carpenter, Robert C.·1986·Ecological Monographs

Abstract

Coral reef herbivores were classified into three functional groups according to criteria describing the frequency and intensity of disturbance to the algal community created by their herbivory. These herbivore groups included: microherbivores, which have small foraging ranges (1—100 cm 2) and a high frequency of grazing any point within their range; the echinoid Diadema antillarum, which has intermediate—size foraging ranges (0.5—1 m 2) and intermediate frequencies of grazing any one area within an individual's range; and herbivorous fishes, with large foraging ranges (up to 0.5 ha) and the lowest grazing frequencies at any one site. Algal communities on experimental coral—settling plates were subjected to treatments designed to detect the effects of grazing by representatives of each functional herbivore group on algal biomass, community structure, and primary productivity in a backreef/reefcrest habitat in St. Croix, United States Virgin Islands. Abundances of microherbivores and herbivorous fishes (mainly juvenile scarids) fluctuated over time, while Diadema antillarum abundance remained relatively constant. Grazing intensity (as measured by the rate of algal biomass removal and algal standing crop under different grazing regimes) was greatest for D. antillarum; grazing by D. antillarum resulted in low—biomass, highly productive algal turfs (O 2 release per unit chlorophyll a per unit time: 11.3—22.4 mg · mg—1 · h—1). Algal turfs grazed by D. antillarum were dominated by epilithic and endolithic filamentous and crustose species. Grazing by herbivorous fishes led to algal communities with algal turfs of higher biomass than in D. antillarum—grazed treatments; these communities became dominated by a single algal species (Sphacelaria tribuloides). Fish—grazed algal communities had lower biomass—specific productivity rates than algal turfs grazed by D. antillarum (2.4—8.4 mg · mg—1 · h—1). Microherbivore—grazed and ungrazed treatments had the lowest biomass—specific productivity rates and eventually became dominated by a few macroalgal species. Although algal biomass in sea urchin—grazed treatments was only 25—50% of the biomass values in treatments not grazed by sea urchins, productivity per unit area was not significantly lower in the former treatments, suggesting a positive effect of sea urchin grazing on algal productivity. This positive effect is a result of the reduction of algal self—shading when grazing is intense and/or the input of regenerated nutrients from D. antillarum excretions. Coral reef plant—herbivore interactions are similar to those in terrestrial grassland—herbivore systems. As in many terrestrial systems, plant—herbivore interactions result in higher overall ecosystem primary productivity and apparently facilitate the flow of energy and materials in this case from the highly productive algal turf component to higher levels in the reef trophic web.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1942551

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Carpenter, R. C.
Venue
Ecological Monographs
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1986-12
Volume
56
Issue
4
Pages
345-364
ISSN
  • 0012-9615 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7015
OpenAlex
W1997371999
Cited by
649
References
1
FWCI
24.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.