Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 256

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Ecosystem Dynamics of a Subtropical Floodplain Forest

Frangi, Jorge L., Lugo, Ariel E.·1985·Ecological Monographs

Abstract

The carbon, phosphorus, and water cycles of a subtropical floodplain forest, and related ecosystem characteristics, were studied. Located at 750 m elevation in Puerto Rico (latitude 18°N) the forest had 27 tree species, 3059 stems/ha, a basal area of 42.4 m 2/ha, maximum height of 17 m, and a leaf area index of 3.3. Palm (Prestoea montana) dominated the forest, and, with two other species, accounted for 68% of the dominance. Throughfall, stemflow, interception, runoff, transpiration, and evapotranspiration accounted for 81.6, 9.8, 8.6, 77.7, 13.7, and 22.3% of annual rainfall (3725 mm) respectively. The stand carbon storage was 28.77 kg/m 2, distributed as follows: aboveground 35.4%, vegetation 44.2%, soil to 1 m depth 55%, palms 10.9%. Vegetation biomass was partitioned as follows: leaves 9.8% (75% are palm leaves), wood 68%, and roots 21.8%. Net aboveground primary carbon productivity (NPP) was 876 g°m—2°yr—1. Average litterfall was 2.4 g°m—2°d—1 (palm leaves 32%, other leaves 39%, and wood 10%). Half—lives of decaying material were 188, 306, 462, and 576 d, respectively, for palm leaves still attached to the parent tree, dicotyledonous leaves, palm leaves on the ground, and palm trunks. Total organic carbon concentrations in stream water increased with increasing stream discharge (from 2 g/m 3 to 30 g/m 3). Watershed export of carbon was 50 g°m—2°yr—1 (including 12 g°m—2°yr—1 in the form of leaf litter). Mean P concentration in palm leaves (1.18 mg/g) was twice that in dicotyledonous leaves (0.64 mg/g). Compared to a rainfall phosphorus input to the watershed of 63 mg°m—2°yr—1, leaching from the canopy was high (167 mg°m—2°yr—1), as was the loss of P from the watershed (611 mg°m—2°yr—1). Phosphorus—conserving mechanisms included a high rate of retranslocation in palms (504 mg°m—2°yr—1). In spite of these mechanisms, there was a net P loss from the watershed that ranged from 136 to 544 mg°m—2°yr—1. Periodic flooding, poor soil aeration, intensive year—round rainfall, and low atmospheric saturation vapor pressure deficits are believed to be the main driving forces of the floodplain forest, which exhibits many characteristics typical of lowland rain forests and floodplain wetlands. Rates of NPP, litterfall, and biomass turnover (residence time of 14—17 yr) are faster than expected for the climatic conditions, whereas rates of wood production and storage of organic matter in the vegetation and soil profile are lower than expected for the climate.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1942582

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 256

Metadata

Authors
Frangi, J. L., & Lugo, A. E.
Venue
Ecological Monographs
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1985-09
Volume
55
Issue
3
Pages
351-369
ISSN
  • 0012-9615 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7015
OpenAlex
W1981738404
Cited by
256
References
0
FWCI
5.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ecosystem Dynamics of a Subtropical Floodplain Forest. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1942582
The paper
Frangi, J. L., & Lugo, A. E. (1985). Ecosystem Dynamics of a Subtropical Floodplain Forest. Ecological Monographs. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942582

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.