The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spatial and Temporal Variation in Tropical Fish Trophic Networks
Abstract
Observed properties of natural food webs have both important theoretical and important management implications. Four lowland aquatic food webs were investigated over the course of two years: a large swamp and a small stream in Costa Rica, and a similar swamp and stream in the Venezuelan llanos. Each local ecosystem differed from the three others with respect to environmental changes associated with seasonal rainfall. Phylogenetic composition and diversity of biotas also varied among systems. Volumetric proportional utilization coefficients from fish gut contents were used as estimates of the intensity of predator—prey interactions. An annual and two or more seasonal food webs were constructed for each local community. Aquatic communities were defined operationally using common fish species as consumers, and using the sink subweb associated with the top predator of each system. A computer calculated a variety of food—web statistics and plotted food—web diagrams containing either (a) all observed trophic links (predator—prey interactions), or (b) subsets with weak links eliminated at prescribed thresholds. Individual community food webs contained from 58 (stream, Costa Rica) to 104 (swamp, Venezuela) interactive taxonomic units and from 208 to 1243 total trophic links. Food—web parameters were very sensitive to changes in level of link threshold. Web connectance and related parameters converged near link threshold 0.04 (utilization coefficients <0.04 eliminated) in a variety of inter—web comparisons. Despite large differences in assemblage composition and attributes of the physical environment, distributions of trophic levels calculated according to a trophic continuum algorithm were very similar among study systems. Herbivores, detritivores, and their direct predators formed the largest proportions of fishes in each assemblage, followed by omnivores and secondary carnivores. Fishes that fed at more than one trophic interval were extremely common in all food webs. Analysis of covariance was used to compare structural features of different webs across a range of link thresholds. Extensive among—site variation in food—web parameters was associated with differences in species richness and environmental differences associated with rainfall patterns, physiography, and gross primary production. Seasons generally influenced food—web parameters less than did site differences. Relative importance of detritus, aquatic primary production, and terrestrial production in aquatic food webs varied seasonally in each system. Detritus, derived primarily from aquatic macrophytes, was an important pathway in both tropical swamp ecosystems. Aquatic primary productivity comprised the largest fraction of fish diets during the wet season in the Venezuelan swamp, but it formed the major component of fish diets during the dry season at all other sites. Based on comparisons using 13 webs, two—thirds of the pairings among six food—web parameters used (number of nodes, compartmentation, connectance, average number of prey per node, average number of predators per node, ratio of consumer nodes to total nodes) were positively intercorrelated. Several food—web relationships previously described as constant (e.g., connectance x species richness constancy, species scaling law, link—species scaling law) were not confirmed by my data. These earlier food—web trends are extremely sensitive to methodological biases, especially decisions regarding the degree of taxonomic lumping of species into trophic units. Although food webs have unique emergent properties and spinoff a number of potentially informative macrodescriptors, empirical studies must achieve greater precision and uniformity before analyses can be performed across different systems. Several problems and potential resolutions are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Will a Large Complex System be Stable?
MAY, R. M. (1972) · Nature · doi:10.1038/238413a0 · Cited by 2,869
Food Webs: Linkage, Interaction Strength and Community Infrastructure
Paine, R. T. (1980) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/4220 · Cited by 1,824
Cited by
Weak trophic interactions and the balance of nature.
McCann, K., Hastings, A., & Huxel, G. R. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/27427 · Cited by 1,657
Complex Trophic Interactions in Deserts: An Empirical Critique of Food-Web Theory
Polis, G. A. (1991) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285208 · Cited by 1,041
Effects of seasonality and fish movement on tropical river food webs
Winemiller, K. O., & Jepsen, D. B. (1998) · Journal of Fish Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.1998.tb01032.x · Cited by 508
Self-citationInteraction rewiring and the rapid turnover of plant–pollinator networks
CaraDonna, P. J., Petry, W. K., Brennan, R. M., Cunningham, J. L., Bronstein, J. L., Waser, N. M., & Sanders, N. J. (2017) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12740 · Cited by 395
A new sampling formula for neutral biodiversity
Etienne, R. S. (2005) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00717.x · Cited by 263
Metadata
- Authors
- Winemiller, K. O.
- Venue
- Ecological Monographs
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1990-09
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 331-367
- ISSN
- 0012-9615 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7015
- OpenAlex
- W2039595174
- Cited by
- 626
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spatial and Temporal Variation in Tropical Fish Trophic Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1943061
- The paper
- Winemiller, K. O. (1990). Spatial and Temporal Variation in Tropical Fish Trophic Networks. Ecological Monographs. https://doi.org/10.2307/1943061
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.