Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 636

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ecomorphology, Performance Capability, and Scaling of West Indian Anolis Lizards: An Evolutionary Analysis

Losos, Jonathan B.·1990·Ecological Monographs

Abstract

Studies of ecomorphology–the relationship among species between morphology and ecology–contain two implicit and rarely tested hypotheses: (1) that morphological differences among species result in differences in performance capability at ecologically relevant tasks, which, in turn, produce differences in behavior and ecology; and (2) that morphology, performance capability, ecology and behavior have evolved synchronously. I tested these hypotheses using the Anolis lizards of Jamaica and Puerto Rico. I measured morphological and performance variables on recently caught lizards. Movement, display rate and microhabitat measurements were made on lizards observed in the field. Body size explained most of the variation in morphology and performance ability, but was not correlated with the ecological or behavioral variables. When the effect of body size is removed from the morphological and performance variables, the ecomorphological hypotheses were confirmed. Species that were similar morphologically were also similar in performance ability, ecology, and behavior. Evolutionary changes in morphology, performance, and ecology and behavior (ecobehavior) were correlated. The morphology–ecobehavior comparison revealed that: long—legged, heavy—bodied lizards jump farther in nature, jump and display more often, walk less often, and use wide perches that are distant from the nearest available perches; and that species with many subdigital lamellae perch lower, use narrower supports, and walk more frequently. Inclusion of performance parameters revealed a relationship, in agreement with biomechanical models, between body proportions and running and jumping capability; in turn, performance capability related to locomotor patterns and microhabitat use. Despite the relationship between lamellae number and ecobehavioral variables, clinging performance did not contribute to the correlations with either morphology or ecology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1943062

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 636

Metadata

Authors
Losos, J. B.
Venue
Ecological Monographs
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1990-09
Volume
60
Issue
3
Pages
369-388
ISSN
  • 0012-9615 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7015
OpenAlex
W2074330481
Cited by
636
References
3
FWCI
14.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ecomorphology, Performance Capability, and Scaling of West Indian Anolis Lizards: An Evolutionary Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1943062
The paper
Losos, J. B. (1990). Ecomorphology, Performance Capability, and Scaling of West Indian Anolis Lizards: An Evolutionary Analysis. Ecological Monographs. https://doi.org/10.2307/1943062

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.