Cited by 1,238Evolution and Paleontology StudiesMorphological variations and asymmetryAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

Phylogenetic Analysis of Covariance by Computer Simulation

Garland, T., Dickerman, A. W., Janis, C. M., Jones, J. A.·1993·Systematic Biology

Abstract

Biologists often compare average phenotypes of groups of species defined cladistically or on behavioral, ecological, or physiological criteria (e.g., carnivores vs. herbivores, social vs. nonsocial species, endotherms vs. ectotherms). Hypothesis testing typically is accomplished via analysis of variance (ANOVA) or covariance (ANCOVA; often with body size as a covariate). Because of the hierarchical nature of phylogenetic descent, however, species may not represent statistically independent data points, degrees of freedom may be inflated, and significance levels derived from conventional tests cannot be trusted. As one solution to this degrees of freedom problem, we propose using empirically scaled computer simulation models of continuous traits evolving along “known” phylogenetic trees to obtain null distributions of F statistics for ANCOVA of comparative data sets. These empirical null distributions allow one to set critical values for hypothesis testing that account for nonindependence due to specified phylogenetic topology, branch lengths, and model of character change. Computer programs that perform simulations under a variety of evolutionary models (gradual and speciational Brownian motion, Ornstein-Uhlenbeck, punctuated equilibrium; starting values, trends, and limits to phenotypic evolution can also be specified) and that will analyze simulated data by ANCOVA are available from the authors on request. We apply the proposed procedures to the analysis of differences in h…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/sysbio/42.3.265

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The tracing of female horn evolution on the composite tree has strong phylogenetic signal (p < 0.001).

    “We determined that the tracing of female horn evolution on this composite tree has strong phylogenetic signal (Blomberg et al. 2003; p < 0.001) using PDAP 6.0 software (Garland et al. 1993); therefore, related species tend to resemble each other in their tendency for females to have horns.”

    From Evolution of weaponry in female bovids (2009) · cites this paper as Garland et al. 1993

  • Statistical significance as measured by a phylogenetic ANOVA was found for agility of the main prey (F= 11.564; p = 0.001), hunting habitat (F= 7.987; p = 0.038) and nesting territoriality (F= 7.239; p = 0.015).

    “Statistical significance as measured by a phylogenetic ANOVA (Garland et al. 1993) was found for agility of the main prey (F= 11.564; p = 0.001), hunting habitat (F= 7.987; p = 0.038) and, nesting territoriality (F= 7.239; p = 0.015).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garland, T., Dickerman, A. W., Janis, C. M., & Jones, J. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Brown University (US)
Venue
Systematic Biology
Published
1993-09-01
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
265-292
ISSN
  • 1063-5157 (ISSN-L)
  • 1076-836X
OpenAlex
W2088262090
Cited by
1,238
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 39
FWCI
23.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Systematic Biology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
covariance analysis, empirical null distribution, phylogenetic autocorrelation, phylogenetically independent contrasts, Brownian motion, Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process, punctuated equilibrium, home range, Carnivora, ungulates, diet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review