Cited by 84Electoral Systems and Political ParticipationAmerican Political and Social DynamicsAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics

Components of Electoral Decision

Stokes, Donald E., Campbell, Angus, Miller, Warren E.·1958·American Political Science Review

Abstract

What combination of forces elects a President? Each electoral decision releases a flood of interpretive comment about the conditions, circumstances, and causes which have influenced the result. A very great assortment of factors is examined and varying estimates are made of the responsibility of each for the outcome. Certainly, interpretations of the most recent presidential contest have shown the variety of ideas Americans bring to the analysis of their national elections. Mr. Eisenhower's victory has been attributed to the satisfactions engendered by national prosperity; to the anxieties raised by the threat of war; to the moods of racial, ethnic, or other groupings in the population; to the personal attractiveness of the winning candidate; to the conservative temper of the electorate; to the impact of various issues; to changing party loyalties; to the growth of suburbia; to the progress of an electoral cycle; to events and strategems of the nominating conventions and the campaign; to the influence of the press and of the other mass media. The list could be revised or lengthened in many ways.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1952322

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • El primer gran paradigma de la politología norteamericana fue el de la «identificación partidista», acorde con un modelo estable de competición bipartidista.

    “El primer gran paradigma de la politología norteamericana fue el de la «identificación partidista» (Campbell, Gurin y Miller, 1954;Stokes, Campbell y Miller, 1958;Campbell, Converse, Miller y Stokes, 1960;Budge et al., 1976), acorde con un modelo estable de competición bipartidista.”

    From Editorial: La polarización política: definición, dimensiones, medición, resultados y efectos (2025) · cites this paper as Stokes, Campbell y Miller, 1958

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stokes, D. E., Campbell, A., & Miller, W. E.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
American Political Science Review
Published
1958-06
Volume
52
Issue
2
Pages
367-387
ISSN
  • 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5943
OpenAlex
W2312637323
Cited by
84
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
40.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Political Science Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › American Political and Social Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › American Constitutional Law and Politics
Keywords
presidential elections, electoral decision-making, voting behavior, 1952 presidential election, national prosperity, war anxiety, racial and ethnic groups, candidate attractiveness, political affiliation, suburbanization, electoral cycles, electoral strategy, media influence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review