The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Strategy of Ambiguity: Uncertainty and Electoral Competition
Abstract
In this paper problems of social choice in general, and political choice in particular, are considered in light of uncertainty. The space of social alternatives in this formulation includes not only pure social states, but lotteries or probability distributions over those states as well. In the context of candidate strategy selection in a spatial model of political choice, candidate strategy sets are represented by pure strategies—points in the space of alternatives—and ambiguous strategies—lotteries over those points. Questions about optimal strategy choice and the equilibrium properties of these choices are then entertained. Duncan Black's theorem about the dominance of the median preference is generalized, and further contingencies in which the theorem is false are specified. The substantive foci of these results are: (1) the conditions in which seekers of political office will rationally choose to appear equivocal in their policy intentions; and (2) the role of institutional structure in defining equilibrium.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Role of Partisan Stereotypes in Information Processing about Political Candidates
Rahn, W. M. (1993) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2111381 · Cited by 891
Populist Political Communication in Europe
(2016) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315623016 · Cited by 804
The Psychology of Group Conflict and the Dynamics of Oppression: A Social Dominance Perspective
Sidanius, J. (1993) · Explorations in Political Psychology · doi:10.1215/9780822396697-009 · Cited by 365
Bureaucrats or politicians? Part II: Multiple policy tasks
Alesina, A., & Tabellini, G. (2008) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.06.004 · Cited by 334
Candidate reputations and the ‘incumbency effect’
Bernhardt, M. D., & Ingerman, D. E. (1985) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/0047-2727(85)90028-3 · Cited by 296
Metadata
- Authors
- Shepsle, K. A.
- Venue
- American Political Science Review
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1972-06
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 555-568
- ISSN
- 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5943
- OpenAlex
- W2121811560
- Cited by
- 614
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Strategy of Ambiguity: Uncertainty and Electoral Competition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1957799
- The paper
- Shepsle, K. A. (1972). The Strategy of Ambiguity: Uncertainty and Electoral Competition. American Political Science Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/1957799
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.