The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Theory of Political Ambition: Career Choices and the Role of Structural Incentives
Abstract
Office-holders periodically face the problem of choosing among a set of career alternatives, and these alternatives customarily include the choice of dropping out of political life, or seeking reelection, or of choosing to seek higher office. This paper assumes that officeholders behave according to a rational calculus in making such choices, and that the main elements involved in the choice process include the probabilities and values attached by the candidate to his alternatives, and the investments required to obtain these alternatives. Political ambition, or the desire to seek higher office, is shown to develop as a product of the investments that politicians make in their political careers, and the investments are shown to be associated with the structural characteristics of community size and electoral competitiveness. The subjects of the research are 435 city councilmen from 89 cities of the San Francisco Bay Region, and the data include information derived from interviews with the councilmen and aggregate election data collected on each city.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2015) · Adversarial Risk Analysis · doi:10.1201/b18653-3 · Cited by 3,632
Ambition and Politics: Political Careers in the United States.
Sigel, R. S., & Schlesinger, J. A. (1968) · Midwest Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2110340 · Cited by 897
Woodrow Wilson and Colonel House: A Personality Study
Jellison, C., George, A. L., & George, J. L. (1957) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.2307/1845568 · Cited by 248
Woodrow Wilson and Colonel House: A Personality Study
Turner, H. A., George, A. L., & George, J. L. (1958) · The Western Political Quarterly · doi:10.2307/443590 · Cited by 86
Cited by
Ambition, federalism, and legislative politics in Brazil
(2003) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-1193 · Cited by 290
When to Risk It? Institutions, Ambitions, and the Decision to Run for the U.S. House
MAESTAS, C. D., FULTON, S., MAISEL, L. S., & STONE, W. J. (2006) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055406062101 · Cited by 274
Leech, B. L. (2010) · The Oxford Handbook of American Political Parties and Interest Groups · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199542628.003.0028 · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- Black, G. S.
- Venue
- American Political Science Review
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1972-03
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 144-159
- ISSN
- 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5943
- OpenAlex
- W2105009130
- Cited by
- 485
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 52.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Theory of Political Ambition: Career Choices and the Role of Structural Incentives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1959283
- The paper
- Black, G. S. (1972). A Theory of Political Ambition: Career Choices and the Role of Structural Incentives. American Political Science Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/1959283
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.