The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ambition, federalism, and legislative politics in Brazil
Abstract
Ambition theory suggests that scholars can understand a good deal about politics by exploring politicians' career goals. In the USA, an enormous literature explains congressional politics by assuming that politicians primarily desire to win re-election. In contrast, although Brazil's institutions appear to encourage incumbency, politicians do not seek to build a career within the legislature. Instead, political ambition focuses on the subnational level. Even while serving in the legislature, Brazilian legislators act strategically to further their future extra-legislative careers by serving as 'ambassadors' of subnational governments. Brazil's federal institutions also affect politicians' electoral prospects and career goals, heightening the importance of subnational interests in the lower chamber of the national legislature. Together, ambition and federalism help explain important dynamics of executive-legislative relations in Brazil. This book's rational-choice institutionalist perspective contributes to the literature on the importance of federalism and subnational politics to understanding national-level politics around the world.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
“Effective” Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe
Laakso, M., & Taagepera, R. (1979) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/001041407901200101 · Cited by 3,439
Congress: The Electoral Connection, by David R. Mayhew
Page, B. I. (1975) · Political Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2148248 · Cited by 3,130
Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: A rank ordering of electoral formulas
Carey, J. M., & Shugart, M. S. (1995) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/0261-3794(94)00035-2 · Cited by 2,663
Legislative leviathan: party government in the House
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-0579 · Cited by 2,313
The Economic Role of Political Institutions: Market-Preserving Federalism and Economic Development
(1995) · The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jleo.a036861 · Cited by 2,069
The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns
Popkin, S. L. (1991) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226772875.001.0001 · Cited by 1,874
The logic of congressional action
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-4778 · Cited by 1,813
Making votes count: strategic coordination in the world's electoral systems
(1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-2982 · Cited by 1,753
Seats and votes. The effects and determinants of electoral systems
Berg, S. (1990) · European Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1016/0176-2680(90)90044-j · Cited by 1,627
Nested games: rational choice in comparative politics
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-0532 · Cited by 1,336
Cited by
Kitschelt, H., Hawkins, K. A., Luna, J. P., Rosas, G., & Zechmeister, E. J. (2010) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511750311 · Cited by 559
Avoiding Governors: The Success of Bolsa Família
Fenwick, T. B. (2009) · Latin American Research Review · doi:10.1353/lar.0.0073 · Cited by 190
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2003-10-01
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 02
- Pages
- 41-1193-41-1193
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1495718658
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 51
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ambition, federalism, and legislative politics in Brazil. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.41-1193
- The paper
- Ambition, federalism, and legislative politics in Brazil. (2003). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.41-1193
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.