Economic Development and International Migration in Comparative Perspective
Abstract
Economic development is associated with modernization urbanization internal rural-urban migration and international migration. Emigration is positively associated with development and aid to developing countries will increase emigration from those countries until the developing country reaches a standard of living equal to that of the developed country. Studies of European emigration to America have shown that emigration is correlated with the onset of industrialization and that emigration was highest when the home country was experiencing a depression and the US economy was in a period of upswing. The basis of society in an underdeveloped country is labor-intensive subsistence farming which provides work and sustenance to a household or community. As soon as capital is applied to agriculture the small peasant holdings are replaced by large private holdings efficiently farmed by machinery and producing surpluses that find their way to markets that is to urban areas which represent concentrations of wealth. The fabric of agricultural society is destabilized as the peasant owner becomes a hired laborer who migrates to the urban area when farms need fewer and factories more laborers. The 1st phase of migration is thus rural to urban. But development is discontinuous both in time and in space and when the displaced worker cannot find employment in the cities of his own country he emigrates to another. Transportation and communication facilities developed to facilitate industrial and commercial exchange also serve as carriers of international migration usually to the same country with which close economic links have already been established. International migration feeds on itself because earlier immigrants provide a network that makes resettlement easier cheaper and less risky for the next wave of migrants. Moreover the emigrants send money back to the home country which helps to speed up the development process in the home country until modernization and urbanization reach the point where there are no more displaced peasants to export. The experience of the United States and Mexico illustrates most phases of the emigration cycle. The 1st wave of Mexican emigration to the US lasted from 1900 to 1929 when the US economy was growing and the Mexican Revolution (1910-1919) devastated the Mexican economy. In the 1930s Mexico experienced a period of rapid growth. The 2nd wave of emigration 1942-1964 stemmed from the coincidence of drought in Mexico and wartime labor shortage in the US which was remedied by the bracero program which granted temporary visas to Mexican agricultural workers. The 3rd and current wave of emigration began in the mid-1960s. It was fueled by the Mexican governments ambitious economic reform program which was to be paid for out of oil revenues. When oil prices fell the Mexican economy suffered a crisis of inflation and debt. However the development process in Mexico is reaching the stage where there are no longer large numbers of surplus agricultural workers and Mexican emigration should diminish over the next 2 decades.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Economic developments, including sudden recessions and crises or booms, have affected key components of population change.
“Since Malthus first noted this connection, economic developments, including sudden recessions and crises, or booms, have affected key components of population change.”
From Demography: Fast and Slow (2022) · cites this paper as Massey 1988
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sometimes You Just Have to Leave: Domestic Threats and Forced Migration, 1964-1989
Davenport, C., Moore, W., & Poe, S. (2003) · International Interactions · doi:10.1080/03050620304597 · Cited by 373 · see citing works
Billari, F. C. (2022) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.1111/padr.12464 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Heritage Language Maintenance Among Immigrant Youth: Factors Influencing Proficiency and Identity
Alshihry, M. A. (2024) · Journal of Language Teaching and Research · doi:10.17507/jltr.1502.18 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
- Authors
- Massey, D. S.
- Corresponding author
- Massey, Douglas S.
- ORCID
- Massey, Douglas S.
- Venue
- Population and Development Review
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1988-09
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 383
- ISSN
- 0098-7921 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2002991392
- Cited by
- 658
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 52 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 16.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Population and Development Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Labor Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Demography › Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies
- Social Sciences › Demography › Diaspora, migration, transnational identity
- Keywords
- international migration, economic development, emigration, rural-urban migration, modernization, urbanization, peasant displacement, agricultural modernization, remittances, Mexican migration to the United States, Bracero Program, Mexican Revolution, oil crisis, economic reform, industrialization, developing countries, Mexico–United States relations, labor migration, transport and communications
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review