Cited by 374Political Conflict and GovernanceMigration, Refugees, and IntegrationMigration and Exile Studies

Sometimes You Just Have to Leave: Domestic Threats and Forced Migration, 1964-1989

Open access
Davenport, Christina, Moore, Will, Poe, Steven·2003·International Interactions

Abstract

In this study we explore why persons flee their homes to become refugees and internally displaced persons. We contend that individuals will tend to flee when the integrity of their person is threatened. Further, we argue that they will flee toward countries where they expect conditions to be better. We conduct statistical analyses using fixed effects least squares, on a pooled cross-sectional time-series data set, consisting of data from 129 countries for the years 1964-1989. Our findings support the conclusion that threats to personal integrity are of primary importance in leading people to abandon their homes. Measures of state threats to personal integrity, dissident threats to personal integrity, and joint state-dissident threats each have statistically significant and substantively important effects on migrant production. We also find that countries making moves toward democracy tend to have greater number of forced migrants, once other factors are considered. We conclude the analysis by identifying several lucrative areas for further investigation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03050620304597

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Armed conflict commonly causes widespread forced migration, especially conflicts that generate high casualty figures.

    “A common denominator of most conflicts, especially those that generate high casualty figures, is widespread forced migration (154-157).”

    From Vicious Circles: Violence, Vulnerability, and Climate Change (2021) · cites this paper as [154]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 93 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davenport, C., Moore, W., & Poe, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • Florida State University (US)
  • University of North Texas (US)
Venue
International Interactions
Published
2003-01
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
27-55
ISSN
  • 0305-0629 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-7444
OpenAlex
W2056037267
Cited by
373
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 9
FWCI
15.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Interactions (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • ICPSR Data Holdings
Funders
Florida State University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Exile Studies
Keywords
forced migration, refugees, internally displaced persons, personal integrity, political violence, democratization, migration determinants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review