Cited by 169Family Dynamics and RelationshipsSocial Policies and FamilyGender, Labor, and Family Dynamics

Fertility Decisions in the FRG and GDR: An Analysis with Data from the German Fertility and Family Survey

Open access
Kreyenfeld, Michaela·2004·Demographic Research

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to compare family policies and fertility patterns in the former German Democratic Republic (GDR) and the German Federal Republic (FRG). Among other aspects, both societies particularly differed in the integration of women into

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4054/demres.2004.s3.11

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Adler, M.A., 1997. "Social change and decline in marriage and fertility in Eastern Germany." Journal of Marriage and the Family 59 (1): 37-49.
  2. Becker, G.S., 1993. A Treatise on the Family. Enlarged edition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
  3. Bundesinstitut für Bevölkerungsforschung (BiB), 1999. Age and parity specific fertility rates for East German birth cohorts 1937-1958. Wiesbaden. (Provided by Jürgen Dorbritz, BiB). Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Sozialordnung (BMA), 1994. Übersicht über das Sozialrecht. Third revised and enlarged edition. Bonn. Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Sozialordnung (BMA), 2000. Übersicht über das Sozialrecht. Sixth revised and enlarged edition. Bonn.
  4. Dorbritz, J., and Fleischhacker, J., 1995. "Der Übergang von der Bevölkerungs-zur Familienpolitik in den neuen Bundesländern -ein Beitrag zum Familienpolitischen Diskurs in Deutschland." Zeitschrift für Bevölkerungswissenschaft 20 (2): 159-185.
  5. Greinert, W.D., 1995. The Dual System of Vocational Education and Training in the Federal Republic of Germany. Structure and Function. Second revised edition. Holland and Josenhans, Stuttgart.
  6. Klein, T., and Lauterbach, W., 1994. "Bildungseinflüsse auf Heirat, die Geburt des ersten Kindes und die Erwerbsunterbrechung von Frauen." Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 46 (2): 278-298.
  7. Pfaff, A.B., 1997. "Soziale Sicherung der Frau im zukünftigen Sozialstaat: Veränderte Rahmenbedingungen und Gestaltungsperspektiven." Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 216 (4-5): 454-477.
  8. Pohl, K., 1995. Familienbildung und Kinderwunsch in Deutschland: Design und Struktur des deutschen FFS. Bundesinstitut für Bevölkerungsforschung (BiB) (ed.), Materialien zur Bevölkerungsforschung 82a. Wiesbaden. Population Activity Unit, 2000. Fertility and Family Surveys. Available http://www.unece.org/ead/pau/ffs.
  9. Schmähl, W., 1992. "Sozialpolitik und Systemtransformation: Zur Bedeutung und zur Veränderung von Sozialpolitik im Prozeß der deutschen Vereinigung." In: Schmähl, W. (ed.), Sozialpolitik im Prozeß der deutschen Vereinigung. Campus, Frankfurt am Main: 26-58.
  10. Speigner, W., 1989. "Bevölkerungspolitik -Bestand der Sozial-und Gesellschaftspolitik." In: Akademie der Wissenschaften der DDR (ed.), Demographie DDR 1970-1987. Berlin: 2-11.
  11. Stata Press, College Station. Statistisches Bundesamt, 1999a. Bevölkerung und Erwerbstätigkeit. Gebiet und Bevölkerung 1997. Fachserie 1, Reihe 1. Metzler-Poeschel, Stuttgart. Statistisches Bundesamt, 1999b. Bevölkerungsstatistische Übersichten 1946-1989.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kreyenfeld, M.
Affiliations
Max Planck Society (DE)
Corresponding author
Kreyenfeld, Michaela
Venue
Demographic Research
Published
2004-04-17
Volume
Special 3
Pages
275-318
ISSN
1435-9871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2108347372
Cited by
169
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 5
FWCI
26.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Demographic Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • OPUS 4 (Zuse Institute Berlin) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Policies and Family
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Keywords
reproductive decision-making, family policy, East Germany, West Germany, German reunification, women's employment, fertility patterns

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review