Slaughter of the Innocents: Coercive Birth Control iN China
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
American opponents of China's one-child policy have focused on abuses associated with the policy, such as cadres killing babies or physically forcing women to undergo sterilizations or abortions.
“American opponents of China's one-child policy have focused on abuses associated with the policy, such as cadres killing babies or physically forcing women to undergo sterilizations or abortions (Aird 1990;Mosher 1993).”
From China's One-Child Policy and the Empowerment of Urban Daughters (2002) · cites this paper as Aird 1990
Cited by
Sorted by citations
China's One-Child Policy and the Empowerment of Urban Daughters
Fong, V. L. (2002) · American Anthropologist · doi:10.1525/aa.2002.104.4.1098 · Cited by 424 · see citing works
- Authors
- Greenhalgh], [., & Aird, J. S.
- Venue
- Population and Development Review
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1990-12
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 788
- ISSN
- 0098-7921 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4299821327
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Population and Development Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Human Rights and Reproductive Law
- Keywords
- family planning, one-child policy, population control, reproductive rights
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
