Fertility Transition in Thailand: A Qualitative Analysis
Abstract
This paper analyzes qualitative information gathered through focus group sessions with men and women who built their families before the Thai fertility decline and with a younger generation whose members are limiting family size to 2 or 3 children. The ultimate aim of the study is to generate qualitative data (perceptions opinions and attitudes) that will complement the quantitative documentation of the ongoing fertility transition in Thailand including its timing and pace. 4 major components are identified all of which interacted to result in an abrupt and rapid shift in reproductive patterns. 1) Fundamental social and economic changes under way in Thailand for some time are responsible in part for the latent demand for fertility control among the older generation and far more so for the current desire for smaller families among the younger. Participants viewed larger numbers of children as a burden with which they are either unable or unwilling to cope. The analysis points to a perceived increase of monetary costs of raising children and a decrease in some benefits. However some participants felt that more was to be gained from rearing few better educated children than from having many less educated ones. 2 The cultural setting is relatively conducive to the acceptance of deliberately regulated fertility and limitation of family size as adaptations to changing circumstances. There exists a prevailing expectation that each conjegal unit will be largely responsible for the su…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Parents are likely to want few children in a modern economy, in which children cannot contribute much to family income even though they cost a lot of time and money to raise and educate.
“Parents are likely to want few children in a modern economy, in which children cannot contribute much to family income even though they cost a lot of time and money to raise and educate (Aries 1996:413;Handwerker 1986:3;Knodel et al. 1984;Oshima 1983).”
From China's One-Child Policy and the Empowerment of Urban Daughters (2002) · cites this paper as Knodel et al. 1984
Cites
Toward A Restatement of Demographic Transition Theory
Caldwell, J. C. (1976) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.2307/1971615 · Cited by 1,005 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
China's One-Child Policy and the Empowerment of Urban Daughters
Fong, V. L. (2002) · American Anthropologist · doi:10.1525/aa.2002.104.4.1098 · Cited by 424 · see citing works
- Authors
- Knodel, J., Havanon, N., & Pramualratana, A.
- Venue
- Population and Development Review
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1984-06
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 297
- ISSN
- 0098-7921 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2069534049
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 10.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Population and Development Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Keywords
- fertility transition, fertility decline, family size limitation, contraceptive use, family planning programs, child-rearing costs, social change, Thailand
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review