The DOI matches its Crossref record.
After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars
Abstract
The end of the Cold War was a big bang reminiscent of earlier moments after major wars, such as the end of the Napoleonic Wars in 1815 and the end of the World Wars in 1919 and 1945. Here John Ikenberry asks the question, what do states that win wars do with their newfound power and how do they use it to build order? In examining the postwar settlements in modern history, he argues that powerful countries do seek to build stable and cooperative relations, but the type of order that emerges hinges on their ability to make commitments and restrain power. The author explains that only with the spread of democracy in the twentieth century and the innovative use of international institutions--both linked to the emergence of the United States as a world power--has order been created that goes beyond balance of power politics to exhibit constitutional characteristics. The open character of the American polity and a web of multilateral institutions allow the United States to exercise strategic restraint and establish stable relations among the industrial democracies despite rapid shifts and extreme disparities in power. This volume includes a new preface reflecting on the reverberating impact of past postwar settlements and the lessons that hold contemporary relevance. Blending comparative politics with international relations, and history with theory, After Victory will be of interest to anyone concerned with the organization of world order, the role of institutions in world politics, and the lessons of past postwar settlements for today. It also speaks to today's debate over the ability of the United States to lead in an era of unipolar power.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Why is There No NATO in Asia? Collective Identity, Regionalism, and the Origins of Multilateralism
Hemmer, C., & Katzenstein, P. J. (2002) · International Organization · doi:10.1162/002081802760199890 · Cited by 564
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-2459 · Cited by 494
Challenges to the Liberal Order: Reflections on International Organization
Lake, D. A., Martin, L. L., & Risse, T. (2021) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818320000636 · Cited by 438
Norm Subsidiarity and Regional Orders: Sovereignty, Regionalism, and Rule-Making in the Third World1
Acharya, A. (2011) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2010.00637.x · Cited by 422
A cultural theory of international relations
(2009) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-2254 · Cited by 379
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, T., & Ikenberry, G. J.
- Venue
- Foreign Affairs
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 170
- ISSN
- 0015-7120 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1498842964
- Cited by
- 1,264
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 203.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/20050090
- The paper
- Smith, T., & Ikenberry, G. J. (2001). After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Foreign Affairs. https://doi.org/10.2307/20050090
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.