Immobilization of a pygmy hippopotamus (Choeropsis liberiensis)
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Respiratory rate for conscious C. liberiensis is reported at 10-16 breaths/min.
“Respiratory rate (breaths/min) for conscious C. liberiensis is reported at 10-16 (Pearce et al. 1985).”
From Choeropsis liberiensis (Artiodactyla: Hippopotamidae) (2019) · cites this paper as Pearce et al. 1985
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Flacke, G. L., Chambers, B. K., Martin, G. B., & Paris, M. C. J. (2015) · Der Zoologische Garten · doi:10.1016/j.zoolgart.2015.07.006 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Choeropsis liberiensis (Artiodactyla: Hippopotamidae)
Flacke, G. L., & Decher, J. (2019) · Mammalian Species · doi:10.1093/mspecies/sez017 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Pearce, P. C., Gustavo, C., Gulland, F., & Knight, J.
- ORCID
- Gulland, F.
- Venue
- The Journal of Zoo Animal Medicine
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1985
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 104
- ISSN
- 0093-4526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2802072068
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Zoo Animal Medicine (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
- Keywords
- pygmy hippopotamus, Choeropsis liberiensis, animal immobilization, zoo animal medicine, captive wildlife
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
