Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 167

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Queer-Ing Sociology, Sociologizing Queer Theory: An Introduction

Seidman, Steven·1994·Sociological Theory

Abstract

into or accrue sexual meanings by means of discourses and institutional practices. Framing as social unavoidably makes it a political fact. Which sensations or acts are defined as sexual, what moral boundaries demarcate legitimate and illegitimate sex, and who stipulates this are political. Paralleling class or gender politics, sexual politics involve struggles around the formation of, and resistance to, a sexual social hierarchy (Rubin 1983). The current theorization of sex as a social and political fact prompts a rereading of the history of moder societies and social knowledges. Consider an interpretation of classical sociology from this perspective. We are familiar with the standard accounts of the rise of sociology. For example, sociology is described as born in the great transformation from a traditional, agrarian, corporatist hierarchical order to a moder, industrial, class-based, but formally democratic system. The so-called classic sociologists acquired their authority because it is claimed that they provided the core perspectives and themes in terms of which social scientists analyze and debate the great problems of modernity. These perspectives include Marx's theorization of capitalism as a class-divided system, Weber's thesis of the bureaucratization of the world, and Durkheim's theory of social evolution as a process of social differentiation. The classics posed the question of the meaning of modernity in terms of the debates about capitalism, secularization, social differentiation, bureaucratization, class stratification, and social solidarity. If our view of modernity derived exclusively from the sociological classics, we would not know that a central part of the great transformation consisted of efforts to define a sphere of sexuality, to organize bodies, pleasures, desires, and acts as they relate to personal and public life, and that this entailed constructing sexual (and gender) identities, producing discourses and cultural representations, enacting state policies and laws, and conducting religious and familial interventions into personal life. In short, the making of embodied sexual selves and codes has been interlaced with the making of the cultural and institutional life of Western societies. The standard histories link the rise of the modern social sciences to social modernization (e.g., industrialism, class conflict, and bureaucracy), but are silent about sexual (and

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/201862

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Authors
Seidman, S.
Venue
Sociological Theory
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1994-07
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
166
ISSN
0735-2751 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2471369185
Cited by
167
References
1
FWCI
9.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Queer-Ing Sociology, Sociologizing Queer Theory: An Introduction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/201862
The paper
Seidman, S. (1994). Queer-Ing Sociology, Sociologizing Queer Theory: An Introduction. Sociological Theory. https://doi.org/10.2307/201862

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.