The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On Violence
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the clinical realm, defining these categories is complexified by the fact that they have been extensively involved in specific power relations and institutionalized othering processes.
“In the clinical realm, defining these categories is further complexified by the fact that they have been extensively involved in specific power relations and institutionalized othering processes (Ahmed, 2020; Hörnqvist & Flyghed, 2012; Wolff, 1969).”
From Collective case formulation in situations of violent radicalization: A critical perspective in training (2023) · cites this paper as Wolff, 1969
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Johnson-Lafleur, J., Zoldan, Y., Frounfelker, R. L., & Rousseau, C. (2023) · Transcultural Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/13634615221134932 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Wolff, R. P.
- Corresponding author
- Wolff, Robert Paul
- Venue
- The Journal of Philosophy
- Publisher
- Philosophy Documentation Center
- Published
- 1969-10-02
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 601
- ISSN
- 0022-362X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4237550226
- Cited by
- 95
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 12.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Philosophy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Violence, Religion, and Philosophy
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical and Cultural Analysis
- Keywords
- violence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
