Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 520

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Primer in Theory Construction.

Zeller, Richard A., Reynolds, Paul Davidson·1973·Contemporary Sociology

Abstract

INTRODUCTION For What Should Scientific Knowledge Be Useful? Typologies, Prediction and Explanation, Sense of Understanding, Control Theory How Does a Concept or Statement Become Part of a Scientific Body of Knowledge? Desirable Characteristics of Scientific Knowledge--Abstractness, Intersubjectivity (Meaning), Intersubjectivity (Logical Rigor), Empirical Relevance Summary and Conclusion 2. THE IDEA Kuhn Paradigms Example: Freud's Theory of Personality Paradigms Examples: Heider's Balance Theory Two Conceptions Of Status Structures: Elitist and Pluralistic Paradigm Variations Examples: Variations on the Freudian Conception of Personality Variations on Heider's Balance Theory Identifying Paradigms Conclusion 3. CONCEPTS Definition of Concepts Abstract vs. Concrete Concepts Concept Measurement Quantification of Concepts--The Nominal Level, The Ordinal Level, The Interval Level, General Comments on Quantification 4. STATEMENTS Existence Statements Relational Statements--Associational Statements, Casual Statements, Deterministic and Probabilistic Statements Levels of Abstraction Theoretical Statements Relation of Theoretical Statements to Theory Relationship between Theoretical Statements and Empirical Data Summary 5. FORMS OF THEORIES The Set-of-Laws Form Examples: The Iron Law Of Oligarchy The Laws of Operant Behavior The Exercise of Influence in Small Groups The Axiomatic Form Example: The Exercise of Influence in Small Groups The Casual Process Form Examples: The Effect of First Impressions on Cognitions Creation of Oligarchies Operant Behavior, Law II The Exercise Of Influence in Small Groups Status Incongruence and Mental Health Evaluation of the Three Forms of Theory Simulation or Model Building Summary 6. TESTING THEORIES Abstract Statements and Concrete Research Empirical Research and Confidence in Abstract Statements Statisical Decision Procedures--Classical Statistical Inference Should the Hypothesis be Presented before the Data are examined? Changing Confidence in Theories Comparing Theories Conclusion 7. STRATEGIES FOR DEVELOPING A SCIENTIFIC BODY OF KNOWLEDGE Research-The-Theory Theory-Then-Research Comparison of Strategies How to get a New Idea Composite Approach Research Methods Conclusion 8. CONCLUSION Potential for a Social Science Potential for a Social Science APPENDIX: STUDENT EXERCISES Comments Assignment 1: Empirical Generalization and Empirical Support Assignment II: Explanation of an Empirical Generalization Assignment III: Testing a Theory Assignment IV: Application of Theories to Natural Phenomena REFERENCES AUTHOR INDEX SUBJECT INDEX

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2063713

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Authors
Zeller, R. A., & Reynolds, P. D.
Venue
Contemporary Sociology
Published
1973-03
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
170
ISSN
0094-3061 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2036327654
Cited by
520
References
0
FWCI
14.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Primer in Theory Construction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2063713
The paper
Zeller, R. A., & Reynolds, P. D. (1973). A Primer in Theory Construction. Contemporary Sociology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2063713

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.