The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Human Inquiry: A Sourcebook of New Paradigm Research.
Abstract
Sets forth a new paradigm for the philosophy and practice of research in fields of human activity: a collaborative, experimental approach in which inquiry is firmly rooted in subjects' experience of their lives. Covers the philosophy, methodology, practice and prospects of the new paradigm, showing how to do research with people rather than on people. Synthesizes material from researchers pursuing similar paths in Europe, North America, Africa and India as well as relevant reprints and appreciations of classical material.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
REVIEW OF COMMUNITY-BASED RESEARCH: Assessing Partnership Approaches to Improve Public Health
Israel, B. A., Schulz, A. J., Parker, E. A., & Becker, A. B. (1998) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173 · Cited by 5,893
Emerging Criteria for Quality in Qualitative and Interpretive Research
Lincoln, Y. S. (1995) · Qualitative Inquiry · doi:10.1177/107780049500100301 · Cited by 1,568
Getting evidence into practice: the role and function of facilitation
Harvey, G., Loftus‐Hills, A., Rycroft‐Malone, J., Titchen, A., Kitson, A., McCormack, B., & Seers, K. (2002) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02126.x · Cited by 730
on behalf of the GrandStand, S. S. A. T. G. O. T. M. R. G., Leask, C. F., Sandlund, M., Skelton, D. A., Altenburg, T. M., Cardon, G., Chinapaw, M. J. M., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., Verloigne, M., & Chastin, S. F. M. (2019) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-018-0136-9 · Cited by 673
Qualitative research in health care: Using qualitative methods in health related action research
Meyer, J. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7228.178 · Cited by 596
(2006) · Cited by 146
Beresford, P. (2005) · Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale · doi:10.1017/s1121189x0000186x · Cited by 145
Political, epistemological, ecological and spiritual dimensions of participation
Reason, P. (1998) · Studies in Cultures, Organizations and Societies · doi:10.1080/10245289808523509 · Cited by 105
Self-citationCommunity Psychology in Britain
Burton, M., Boyle, S., Psy, C. H. D. C., & Kagan, C. (2007) · International Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-49500-2_11 · Cited by 56
The Eleventh Thesis: Applied Anthropology as Praxis
Warry, W. (1992) · Human Organization · doi:10.17730/humo.51.2.66888878tp700348 · Cited by 41
Critical Praxis Research: Breathing New Life into Research Methods for Teachers
Kress, T. M. (2011) · Explorations of Educational Purpose · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1790-9 · Cited by 45
Becoming a scholarly practitioner: as a teacher in higher education ‘how do I improve my practice’?
Hartog, M. (2018) · Action Learning: Research and Practice · doi:10.1080/14767333.2018.1490697 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Balkwell, J. W., Reason, P., & Rowan, J.
- Venue
- Contemporary Sociology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1983-07
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 425
- ISSN
- 0094-3061 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2091701055
- Cited by
- 773
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 70.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
