Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,229

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Critical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods.

Russell, Cynthia K., Morse, Janice M.·1994·Contemporary Sociology

Abstract

Dialogue On Origins Qualitative Research - Janice M Morse Fact or Fantasy? Dialogue On Learning Qualitative Methods Abstract Knowing - Katharyn A May The Case for Magic in Method Dialogue More on Theory 'Emerging from the Data' - Janice M Morse The Cognitive Processes of Analysis in Qualitative Inquiry Dialogue The Democracy of Interpretation The Proof Is in the Pottery - Margarete Sandelowski Toward a Poetic for Qualitative Inquiry Dialogue On Qualitatively Derived Intervention Inside the Black Box - Janice M Swanson and Linda Chapman Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Conducting Evaluation Research Using a Qualitative Approach Basic Versus Applied Ethnography Evaluation Criteria and Critique of Qualitative Research Studies - Madeleine Leininger Dialogue Good Phenomenology is... The Richness of Phenomenology - Marilyn A Ray Philosophic, Theoretic and Methodologic Concerns Dialogue Clarifying Phenomenological Methods Schools of Phenomenology - Marlene Zichi Cohen and Anna Omery Implications for Research Dialogue On Emic and Etic Styles of Ethnography - Joyceen S Boyle Dialogue Sorting Out the Styles... On the Evaluation of Ethnographies - Majorie A Muecke Dialogue More on Muddling Methods Eroding Grounded Theory - Phyllis Noerager Stern Dialogue Questions About Focus Groups The Group Effect in Focus Groups - Martha Ann Carey Planning, Implementing, and Interpreting Focus Group Research Dialogue Using Videotaped Data Using Videotaped Recordings in Qualitative Research - Joan L Bottorff Dialogue On Mentoring Secondary Analysis in Qualitative Research - Sally Thorne Issues and Implications Dialogue On Writing It Up Qualitative Research Methods From the Reviewer's Perspective - Melanie Dreher Dialogue Researcher-Participant Relationships Research and Therapeutic Interviews - Sally Hutchinson and Holly Wilson A Poststructuralist Perspective Dialogue On Being a Stranger in the Field Research Teams - Toni Tripp-Reimer et al Possibilities and Pitfalls in Collaborative Qualitative Research Dialogue The Politics of Writing Ethical Issues in Ethnography - Juliene G Lipson Dialogue Sloppy Science Promoting Academic Integrity in Qualitative Research - Kathleen A Knafl

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2076454

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 2,229

Metadata

Authors
Russell, C. K., & Morse, J. M.
Venue
Contemporary Sociology
Published
1994-07
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
624
ISSN
0094-3061 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039264823
Cited by
2,229
References
0
FWCI
204.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Critical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2076454
The paper
Russell, C. K., & Morse, J. M. (1994). Critical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods. Contemporary Sociology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2076454

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.