The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Critical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods.
Abstract
Dialogue On Origins Qualitative Research - Janice M Morse Fact or Fantasy? Dialogue On Learning Qualitative Methods Abstract Knowing - Katharyn A May The Case for Magic in Method Dialogue More on Theory 'Emerging from the Data' - Janice M Morse The Cognitive Processes of Analysis in Qualitative Inquiry Dialogue The Democracy of Interpretation The Proof Is in the Pottery - Margarete Sandelowski Toward a Poetic for Qualitative Inquiry Dialogue On Qualitatively Derived Intervention Inside the Black Box - Janice M Swanson and Linda Chapman Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Conducting Evaluation Research Using a Qualitative Approach Basic Versus Applied Ethnography Evaluation Criteria and Critique of Qualitative Research Studies - Madeleine Leininger Dialogue Good Phenomenology is... The Richness of Phenomenology - Marilyn A Ray Philosophic, Theoretic and Methodologic Concerns Dialogue Clarifying Phenomenological Methods Schools of Phenomenology - Marlene Zichi Cohen and Anna Omery Implications for Research Dialogue On Emic and Etic Styles of Ethnography - Joyceen S Boyle Dialogue Sorting Out the Styles... On the Evaluation of Ethnographies - Majorie A Muecke Dialogue More on Muddling Methods Eroding Grounded Theory - Phyllis Noerager Stern Dialogue Questions About Focus Groups The Group Effect in Focus Groups - Martha Ann Carey Planning, Implementing, and Interpreting Focus Group Research Dialogue Using Videotaped Data Using Videotaped Recordings in Qualitative Research - Joan L Bottorff Dialogue On Mentoring Secondary Analysis in Qualitative Research - Sally Thorne Issues and Implications Dialogue On Writing It Up Qualitative Research Methods From the Reviewer's Perspective - Melanie Dreher Dialogue Researcher-Participant Relationships Research and Therapeutic Interviews - Sally Hutchinson and Holly Wilson A Poststructuralist Perspective Dialogue On Being a Stranger in the Field Research Teams - Toni Tripp-Reimer et al Possibilities and Pitfalls in Collaborative Qualitative Research Dialogue The Politics of Writing Ethical Issues in Ethnography - Juliene G Lipson Dialogue Sloppy Science Promoting Academic Integrity in Qualitative Research - Kathleen A Knafl
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The qualitative content analysis process
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x · Cited by 22,617
Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/160940690600500107 · Cited by 11,829
Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research
Attride-Stirling, J. (2001) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/146879410100100307 · Cited by 5,506
Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research
Morse, J. M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spiers, J. (2002) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/160940690200100202 · Cited by 4,978
Self-citationDilemmas in qualitative health research
Yardley, L. (2000) · Psychology & Health · doi:10.1080/08870440008400302 · Cited by 2,310
Metadata
- Authors
- Russell, C. K., & Morse, J. M.
- Venue
- Contemporary Sociology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1994-07
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 624
- ISSN
- 0094-3061 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2039264823
- Cited by
- 2,229
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 204.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Critical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2076454
- The paper
- Russell, C. K., & Morse, J. M. (1994). Critical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods. Contemporary Sociology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2076454
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.