Cited by 5,506Qualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsComputational and Text Analysis MethodsQualitative Research Methods and Ethics

Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research

Open access
Attride-Stirling, Jennifer·2001·Qualitative Research

Abstract

The growth in qualitative research is a well-noted and welcomed fact within the social sciences; however, there is a regrettable lack of tools available for the analysis of qualitative material. There is a need for greater disclosure in qualitative analysis, and for more sophisticated tools to facilitate such analyses. This article details a technique for conducting thematic analysis of qualitative material, presenting a step-by-step guide of the analytic process, with the aid of an empirical example. The analytic method presented employs established, well-known techniques; the article proposes that thematic analyses can be usefully aided by and presented as thematic networks. Thematic networks are web-like illustrations that summarize the main themes constituting a piece of text. The thematic networks technique is a robust and highly sensitive tool for the systematization and presentation of qualitative analyses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/146879410100100307

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Attride-Stirling, J.
Affiliations
Commission for Health Improvement, England,
Venue
Qualitative Research
Published
2001-12
Volume
1
Issue
3
Pages
385-405
ISSN
  • 1468-7941 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-3109
OpenAlex
W2170816415
Cited by
5,506
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 238 · 2025: 321 · 2024: 382 · 2023: 424 · 2022: 441 · 2021: 520 · 2020: 434 · 2019: 395 · 2018: 373 · 2017: 349 · 2016: 309 · 2015: 283 · 2014: 242 · 2013: 235 · 2012: 192
FWCI
25.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Qualitative Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Keywords
thematic networks, thematic analysis, qualitative data analysis, analytic process, text summarization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review