The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes.
Abstract
In Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes, Robert M. Emerson, Rachel I. Fretz, and Linda L. Shaw present a series of guidelines, suggestions, and practical advice for creating useful fieldnotes in a variety of settings, demystifying a process that is often assumed to be intuitive and impossible to teach. Using actual unfinished notes as examples, the authors illustrate options for composing, reviewing, and working fieldnotes into finished texts. They discuss different organizational and descriptive strategies and show how transforming direct observations into vivid descriptions results not simply from good memory but from learning to envision scenes as written. A good ethnographer, they demonstrate, must learn to remember dialogue and movement like an actor, to see colors and shapes like a painter, and to sense moods and rhythms like a poet. This new edition reflects the extensive feedback the authors have received from students and instructors since the first edition was published in 1995. As a result, they have updated the race, class, and gender section, created new sections on coding programs and revising first drafts, and provided new examples of working notes. An essential tool for budding social scientists, the second edition of Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes will be invaluable for a new generation of researchers entering the field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Qualitative Quality: Eight “Big-Tent” Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research
Tracy, S. J. (2010) · Qualitative Inquiry · doi:10.1177/1077800410383121 · Cited by 7,536
Understanding and Evaluating Qualitative Research
Fossey, E., Harvey, C., Mcdermott, F., & Davidson, L. (2002) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.01100.x · Cited by 2,311
Maxwell, J. (2009) · The SAGE Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods · doi:10.4135/9781483348858.n7 · Cited by 1,734
An array of qualitative data analysis tools: A call for data analysis triangulation.
Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2007) · School Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1037/1045-3830.22.4.557 · Cited by 1,525
What is qualitative in qualitative research
Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019) · Qualitative Sociology · doi:10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7 · Cited by 1,280
Metadata
- Authors
- Joffe, C., Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L.
- Venue
- Contemporary Sociology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1996-09
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 705
- ISSN
- 0094-3061 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2048534968
- Cited by
- 5,150
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 65.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2077613
- The paper
- Joffe, C., Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1996). Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. Contemporary Sociology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2077613
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.