Cited by 370Electoral Systems and Political ParticipationFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsGender, Labor, and Family Dynamics

Life-Cycle Transitions and Political Participation: The Case of Marriage

Stoker, Laura, Jennings, M. Kent·1995·American Political Science Review

Abstract

We investigate the consequences of changes in marital status for political participation, treating marital status as marking points of continuity and transition in an individual's life history and marriage as a setting that fosters interaction and interdependence between marital partners. The analysis is based on panel and pseudopanel data from the 1965–82 socialization study of parents, offspring, and spouses. We find that marital transitions affect participation in four ways: (1) marital partners adjust their activity levels to become more like each other after marriage; (2) marital transitions of any type, especially marriage among younger people, tend to depress participation; (3) the overall effect of marriage, however, is powerfully mediated by the participation level of the partner; and (4) these mediation effects are greatest for political activities that involve collective efforts or draw upon the couple's joint resources.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2082435

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Marriages are much more politically homogeneous than one would expect by chance.

    “Observational survey data have long found that marriages are much more politically homogeneous than one would expect by chance (Stoker 1995).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 23 · Cited by 370

Authors
Stoker, L., & Jennings, M. K.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Venue
American Political Science Review
Published
1995-06-01
Volume
89
Issue
2
Pages
421-433
ISSN
  • 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5943
OpenAlex
W1966305122
Cited by
370
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 14
FWCI
17.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Political Science Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Keywords
political participation, marriage, marital status, life cycle transitions, spousal interaction, partner effects, mediating effect

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review