The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Community Within a Community: The Professions
Abstract
HIS paper is concerned with a little explored area of social theory: the structural strains and supports between a contained and the larger society of which it is a part and on which it is dependent. Presumably, the body of theory used for analyzing a must be translated, qualified, or changed when that exists within a larger society. Examples of such communities are fraternal orders such as the Masons, secret or extreme political parties, ethic islands whether rural or urban, organized political or economic interest groups, or a specific profession such as medicine.' From a broad inquiry into such structural relations between the contained and the larger one, it may later be possible to derive important hypotheses about the forces that maintain both of them. studied is the professional community, which is different in important respects from the other examples.2 Only two sets of links have been chosen for exploration: (1) socialization and social control, and (2) client choice or evaluation of the professional. Characteristic of each of the established professions, and a goal of each aspiring occupation, is the community of profession. Each profession is a without physical locus and, like other communities with heavy in-migration, one whose founding fathers are linked only rarely by blood with the present generation. It may nevertheless be called a by virtue of these characteristics: (1) Its members are bound by a sense of identity. (2) Once in it, few leave, so that it is a terminal or continuing status for the most part.3 (3) Its members share values in common. (4) Its role definitions vis-a-vis both members and non-members are agreed upon and are the same for all members. (5) Within the areas of communal action there is a common language, which is understood only partially by outsiders. (6) Community has power over its members. ( 7) Its limits are reasonably clear, though they are not physical and geographical, but social. (8) Though it does not produce the next generation biologically, it does so socially through its control over the selection of professional trainees, and through its training processes it sends these recruits through an adult socialization process. Of course, professions vary in the degree to which they are communities, and it is not novel to view them as such.4 * Paper read at the annual meeting of the Eastern Sociological March, 1956. Morris Zelditch has given various helpful comments to the author. 1 See, for example, Georg Simmel, The Secret and the Secret Society, in Sociology of Georg Simmel, translated by Kurt Wolff, Glencoe: Free Press, 1950, pp. 307-379; William F. Whyte, Street Corner Chicago: University of Chicago, 1943; Louis Kriesberg, National Security and Conduct in the Steel Gray Market, Social Forces, 34 (March, 1956), pp. 268-277, and Customer versus Colleague Ties Among Retail Furriers, Journal of Retailing, 29-30 (Winter, 1954-5), pp. 173-176; Executive Life, ed. Fortune, Garden City: Doubleday, 1956; Allan W. Eister, The Oxford Group Movement, Sociology and Social Research, 34 (November, 1949); David Riesman, Some Informal Notes on American Churches and Sects, Confluence, 4 (July, 1955), pp. 127-159; Paula Brown, Bureaucracy in a Government Laboratory, Institute of Industrial Relations Reprint No. 36, Los Angeles: University of California, 1954; etc. 2 Other areas are analyzed in William J. Goode, Robert K. Merton, and Mary Jean Huntington, Professions in Modern New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1957 (in press). 3 But see the qualifications stated by Albert J. Reiss, Occupational Mobility of Professional Workers, American Sociological Review, 20 (December, 1955), pp. 693-700. 4 See the extended discussion of Discipline, p. 394 ff. in A. M. Carr-Saunders and P. A. Wilson, Professions, Oxford: Clarendon, 1933; Morris L. Cogan, Toward a Definition of Harvard Educational Review, 23 (Winter, 1953), p. 35; Roscoe Pound, Lawyer from Antiquity to Modern Times, St. Paul: West, 1953, pp. 4-10; Abraham Flexner, Is Social Work a Profession? School and 1 (1915), pp. 901-911; Louis D. Brandeis, Business-A Profession, Boston: Small,
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
WHAT IS A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE FIRM? TOWARD A THEORY AND TAXONOMY OF KNOWLEDGE-INTENSIVE FIRMS.
VON NORDENFLYCHT, A. (2010) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2010.45577926 · Cited by 1,077
Lords of the Dance: Professionals as Institutional Agents
Scott, W. R. (2008) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840607088151 · Cited by 814
Professions and Institutional Change: Towards an Institutionalist Sociology of the Professions
Muzio, D., Brock, D. M., & Suddaby, R. (2013) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12030 · Cited by 444
Professionalism as Enterprise: Service Class Politics and the Redefinition of Professionalism
Hanlon, G. (1998) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/0038038598032001004 · Cited by 320
Schwartz, R. D., & Skolnick, J. H. (1962) · Social Problems · doi:10.1525/sp.1962.10.2.03a00030 · Cited by 305
Metadata
- Authors
- Goode, W. J.
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1957-04
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 194
- ISSN
- 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2332651508
- Cited by
- 766
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Community Within a Community: The Professions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2088857
- The paper
- Goode, W. J. (1957). Community Within a Community: The Professions. American Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/2088857
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.