The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Contemporary Approaches to Cognition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena.
Bem, D. J. (1967) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0024835 · Cited by 2,959
Borderline Personality Organization
Kernberg, O. (1967) · Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association · doi:10.1177/000306516701500309 · Cited by 1,295
Cognitive Conceptions of Learning
Shuell, T. J. (1986) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.2307/1170340 · Cited by 1,116
The Omnipotence of Voices: A Cognitive Approach to Auditory Hallucinations
Chadwick, P., & Birchwood, M. (1994) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.164.2.190 · Cited by 803
Objectivity in the eye of the beholder: Divergent perceptions of bias in self versus others
Pronin, E., Gilovich, T., & Ross, L. (2004) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.111.3.781 · Cited by 771
Metadata
- Authors
- Goodnow, J., Bruner, J. S., & Festinger, L.
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1958-04
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 225
- ISSN
- 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2328865585
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contemporary Approaches to Cognition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2089022
- The paper
- Goodnow, J., Bruner, J. S., & Festinger, L. (1958). Contemporary Approaches to Cognition. American Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/2089022
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
