The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Integrating the Individual and the Organization.
Abstract
The emphasis on organizational change in the corporate life of recent years-including job redesign, autonomous groups, high performance work systems, and the redesign of control systems-owes a great deal to the pioneering work of Chris Argyris. This book examines how individuals in organizations can become more effective, in turn making organizations more effective. It explores the conventional pyramidal structure of organizations, in which there is top-down control by managers over workers, and examines their negative consequences. These include organizational injustice and eventually irrational decision-making. Argyris also discusses the characteristic learning system of the modern organization, which he describes as -single-loop- in character. This system, he argues, is only adequeate enough to permit the organization to implement existing policies. It does not permit the more difficult and comprehensive task of questioning underlying goals and assumptions, which he terms -doubt loop- learning. In this kind of learning, the organization is able to confront the more difficult problems that affect organizations in a time of transition. In his new introduction, Argyris reviews the strengths and limitations of the argument advanced in Integrating the Individual and the Organization. He describes why the pyramidal structure endures, and why creating a self-learning organization is an even more challenging task than he has imagined. The book will be of interest to professionals with a long-standing interest in organizational development as well as those just entering the field, managers confronting the challenge of organization change, and researchers in organizational behavior and theory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Markets, Bureaucracies, and Clans
Ouchi, W. G. (1980) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392231 · Cited by 4,735
A Conceptual Framework for the Design of Organizational Control Mechanisms
Ouchi, W. G. (1979) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.25.9.833 · Cited by 3,707
Employee reactions to job characteristics.
Hackman, J. R., & Lawler, E. E. (1971) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0031152 · Cited by 2,442
Toward a Theory of Organizational Culture and Effectiveness
Denison, D. R., & Mishra, A. K. (1995) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.6.2.204 · Cited by 2,383
Managerial Leadership: A Review of Theory and Research
Yukl, G. (1989) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920638901500207 · Cited by 1,648
Metadata
- Authors
- Guest, R. H., & Argyris, C.
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1965-02
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 143
- ISSN
- 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2000584875
- Cited by
- 1,422
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 63.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Integrating the Individual and the Organization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2091786
- The paper
- Guest, R. H., & Argyris, C. (1965). Integrating the Individual and the Organization. American Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/2091786
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.