The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An Interpretation of the Relation Between Objective and Subjective Social Status
Abstract
The pluralist and interest-group (or modified Marxian) views of society offer two competing sets of hypotheses concerning the relationship between objective and subjective social status and the role of other variables in this relationship. Using a 1964 national sample survey of the United States, this paper specifies and examines these hypotheses more fully. Starting with a series of simple formulations, and building up to a fuller multivariate recursive system, the paper concludes that the data are more consistent with the interest-group approach than they are with the pluralist approach.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Adler, N. E., Epel, E. S., Castellazzo, G., & Ickovics, J. R. (2000) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.19.6.586 · Cited by 5,080
Socioeconomic status and health: the role of subjective social status
Demakakos, P., Nazroo, J., Breeze, E., & Marmot, M. (2008) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.038 · Cited by 719
Religious Involvement and Status‐Bridging Social Capital
Wuthnow, R. (2002) · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion · doi:10.1111/1468-5906.00153 · Cited by 462
Sakurai, K., Kawakami, N., Yamaoka, K., Ishikawa, H., & Hashimoto, H. (2010) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.019 · Cited by 128
He, Z.-H., & Yin, W.-G. (2016) · The Journal of Genetic Psychology · doi:10.1080/00221325.2016.1218322 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Jackman, M. R., & Jackman, R. W.
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1973-10
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 569
- ISSN
- 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2328725722
- Cited by
- 416
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Interpretation of the Relation Between Objective and Subjective Social Status. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2094408
- The paper
- Jackman, M. R., & Jackman, R. W. (1973). An Interpretation of the Relation Between Objective and Subjective Social Status. American Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094408
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
