The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toward a Theory of Role Accumulation
Abstract
The assumption that multiplicity of roles produces a strong tendency toward as a consequence of conflict or overload is disputed. The benefits of accumulation tend to outweigh any stress to which it might give rise, thereby yielding net gratification. Four types of rewards derived from accumulation are discussed: role-privileges; overall status security; resources for status enhancement and performance; and enrichment of the personality and ego gratification. The importance of taking rights more fully into account in research and theory is emphasized. The possibility that barriers to accumulation are a source of social instability is briefly assayed. A key assumption underlies current theories of social roles-that multiple relationships with diverse partners is a source of psychological stress and social instability. Goode (1960:485) in particular supports this viewpoint, although it is more or less implicit in the writings of most theorists. Goode introduced the term role strain to signify the difficulty of performing multiple roles, asserting that the resultant tendency toward is a ubiquitous feature of social life.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement
Gouldner, A. W. (1960) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092623 · Cited by 12,001
Goode, W. J. (1960) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092933 · Cited by 2,454
Cited by
From social integration to health: durkheim in the new millennium
Berkman, L. F., Glass, T., Brissette, I., & Seeman, T. E. (2000) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00065-4 · Cited by 4,821
When Work and Family are Allies: A Theory of Work-Family Enrichment
Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. (2006) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2006.19379625 · Cited by 3,837
Recent Developments in Role Theory
Biddle, B. J. (1986) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.so.12.080186.000435 · Cited by 2,358
Thoits, P. A. (1983) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095103 · Cited by 1,361
Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., Wayne, J. H., & Grzywacz, J. G. (2006) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2005.02.002 · Cited by 1,269
Metadata
- Authors
- Sieber, S. D.
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1974-08
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 567
- ISSN
- 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2068944241
- Cited by
- 1,714
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 31.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toward a Theory of Role Accumulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2094422
- The paper
- Sieber, S. D. (1974). Toward a Theory of Role Accumulation. American Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094422
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.