The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Hawthorne Experiments: First Statistical Interpretation
Abstract
A guide is provided to the proceedings of the Hawthorne experiments, and experimental data are now made readily available. Data from the main experiment (that in the first relay assembly test room at Western Electric) are interpreted statistically for the first time. Quantitative analysis of this quasi experiment is accomplished by time-series multiple regression using nearly five years of data. This analysis demonstrates that experimental variables account for some 90% of the variance in quantity and quality of output, both for the group andfor individual workers. Imposition of managerial discipline, economic adversity, and quality of raw materials provide most explanation, obviating the need to draw upon less clearly definable human relations mechanisms. For decades the Hawthorne studies have provided a rationale for humane approaches in the organization of work by suggesting that considerate or participative treatment of workers led to better economic performance. The present analysis suggests, to the contrary, that humanitarian procedures must provide their own justification.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Social Psychology of Organizations.
Hackman, J. R., Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2989929 · Cited by 12,235
Principles of Scientific Management, The
(2015) · The SAGE Encyclopedia of Economics and Society · doi:10.4135/9781452206905.n541 · Cited by 5,038
Ecological Correlations and the Behavior of Individuals
Robinson, W. S. (1950) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2087176 · Cited by 4,513
TESTING FOR SERIAL CORRELATION IN LEAST SQUARES REGRESSION. II
DURBIN, J., & WATSON, G. S. (1951) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/38.1-2.159 · Cited by 3,619
Roethlisberger, F. J., & Dickson, W. J. (2003) · Cited by 2,822
Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research on teaching
Campbell, D. T. (1963) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,541
Parsons, H. M. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.183.4128.922 · Cited by 615
Theory and methods of social research
(1969) · Futures · doi:10.1016/s0016-3287(69)80052-2 · Cited by 351
Industrial Psychology: Its Theoretical and Social Foundations
Blum, M. L., & Naylor, J. C. (1968) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 241
Roethlisberger, F. J. (1941) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674420540 · Cited by 163
Cited by
McCambridge, J., Witton, J., & Elbourne, D. R. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.08.015 · Cited by 2,748
Grant, A. M. (2008) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.108 · Cited by 1,114
The Hawthorne effect: A reconsideration of the methodological artifact.
Adair, J. G. (1984) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.2.334 · Cited by 1,095
The (mis)estimation of neighborhood effects: causal inference for a practicable social epidemiology
Oakes, J. M. (2004) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.08.004 · Cited by 760
Revisits: An Outline of a Theory of reflexive ethnography
Burawoy, M. (2003) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240306800501 · Cited by 586
Metadata
- Authors
- Franke, R. H., & Kaul, J. D.
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1978-10
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 623
- ISSN
- 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1963753105
- Cited by
- 648
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 15.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Hawthorne Experiments: First Statistical Interpretation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2094540
- The paper
- Franke, R. H., & Kaul, J. D. (1978). The Hawthorne Experiments: First Statistical Interpretation. American Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094540
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.