Cited by 216Social Policy and Reform StudiesPolitical Theory and DemocracyElectoral Systems and Political Participation

The Effect of Political Democracy and Social Democracy on Equality in Industrial Societies: A Cross-National Comparison

Hewitt, Christopher·1977·American Sociological Review

Abstract

Christopher Hewitt, The Effect of Political Democracy and Social Democracy on Equality in Industrial Societies: A Cross-National Comparison, American Sociological Review, Vol. 42, No. 3 (Jun., 1977), pp. 450-464

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2094750

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hewitt, C.
Corresponding author
Hewitt, Christopher
Venue
American Sociological Review
Published
1977-06
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
450
ISSN
0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2323486848
Cited by
216
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
69.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Sociological Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Policy and Reform Studies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Keywords
political democracy, social democracy, income inequality, industrial society, welfare state, cross-national comparison, political institutions, social policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review