The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Heterogeneity and Intermarriage
Abstract
public use sample of the 1970 U.S. Census. The two theoretical predictions are: (1) a group's relative size is inversely related to the proportion of its members who are outmarried; and (2) an SMSA's heterogeneity is directly related to the rate of intermarriage in it. The underlying assumption is that the structural constraints of size distributions affect marriage notwithstanding cultural values promoting ingroup marriages. The data confirm the two predictions (corroborating the underlying assumption) for most size differences and most forms of heterogeneity examined. Thus, heterogeneity in national origins, mother tongue, birth region, industry, and occupation raise intermarriage rates in these respects. Although racial heterogeneity does not have this predicted effect, the reason is that the great socioeconomic differences between races consolidate racial boundaries and thereby counteract the influence of heterogeneity on intermarriage. Empirical evidence supports this explanation: when racial income differences are controlled, the predicted positive relationship between racial heterogeneity and intermarriage becomes apparent.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The American Occupational Structure.
Blalock, H. M., Blau, P. M., Duncan, O. D., & Tyree, A. (1968) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092399 · Cited by 4,412
Self-citationThe Coming Crisis of Western Sociology.
Deutsch, S. E., & Gouldner, A. W. (1971) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2094057 · Cited by 1,587
Marital Selection and Occupational Strata
Centers, R. (1949) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/220416 · Cited by 73
The Factor of Religion in the Selection of Marriage Mates
Thomas, J. L. (1951) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2088280 · Cited by 65
Ratio Variables in Aggregate Data Analysis
Bollen, K. A., & Ward, S. (1979) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/004912417900700405 · Cited by 60
Ratio Measurement and Theoretical Inference in Social Research
Kasarda, J. D., & Nolan, P. D. (1979) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/58.1.212 · Cited by 60
Relationships Among Ratio Variables with Common Components: Fact or Artifact
Macmillan, A., & Daft, R. L. (1980) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/58.4.1109 · Cited by 25
Research in Interreligious Dating and Marriage
Barnett, L. D. (1962) · Marriage and Family Living · doi:10.2307/347013 · Cited by 14
Cited by
Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415 · Cited by 18,567
Intermarriage and Homogamy: Causes, Patterns, Trends
Kalmijn, M. (1998) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.395 · Cited by 2,121
Oppenheimer, V. K. (1988) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/229030 · Cited by 1,353
Homophily in Voluntary Organizations: Status Distance and the Composition of Face-to-Face Groups
McPherson, J. M., & Smith-Lovin, L. (1987) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095356 · Cited by 1,203
Educational Assortative Marriage in Comparative Perspective
Blossfeld, H.-P. (2009) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115913 · Cited by 408
Metadata
- Authors
- Blau, P. M., Blum, T. C., & Schwartz, J. E.
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1982-02
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 45
- ISSN
- 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2321367402
- Cited by
- 517
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 24.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Heterogeneity and Intermarriage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2095041
- The paper
- Blau, P. M., Blum, T. C., & Schwartz, J. E. (1982). Heterogeneity and Intermarriage. American Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095041
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.