The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intermarriage and Homogamy: Causes, Patterns, Trends
Open accessAbstract
People have a tendency to marry within their social group or to marry a person who is close to them in status. Although many characteristics play a role in the choice of a spouse, sociologists have most often examined endogamy and homogamy with respect to race/ethnicity, religion, and socioeconomic status. I first give an overview of hypotheses on the causes of endogamy and homogamy. The various hypotheses that have been suggested in the literature can be distinguished as arguments about three more general factors: (a) the preferences of marriage candidates for certain characteristics in a spouse, (b) the interference of “third parties” in the selection process, and (c) the constraints of the marriage market in which candidates are searching for a spouse. Second, I summarize empirical research by answering four questions: (a) To what extent are groups endogamous and how do groups differ in this respect? (b) How has endogamy changed over time? (c) Which factors are related to endogamy? (d) How do various dimensions of partner choice coincide? Third, I discuss strengths and weaknesses of past research. Strengths include the mass of descriptive work that has been done and the development of a multifaceted theoretical perspective which gives sociological theorizing an edge over psychological and economic theories of partner choice. Weaknesses include the lack of standardization of methods in describing patterns and trends and the relatively weak integration of empirical and theoretical work.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The American Occupational Structure.
Blalock, H. M., Blau, P. M., Duncan, O. D., & Tyree, A. (1968) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092399 · Cited by 4,412
(1972) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(72)80121-7 · Cited by 4,052
Assimilation in American Life.
Tomasi, S., & Gordon, M. M. (1964) · International Migration Digest · doi:10.2307/3002902 · Cited by 2,672
Five Decades of Educational Assortative Mating
Mare, R. D. (1991) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095670 · Cited by 1,145
Cultural Capital, Educational Attainment, and Marital Selection
DiMaggio, P., & Mohr, J. (1985) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/228209 · Cited by 950
The American Occupational Structure.
Marsh, R. M., Blau, P. M., & Duncan, O. D. (1968) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2575413 · Cited by 819
A Piece of the Pie: Blacks and White Immigrants Since 1880
Lieberson, S. (1980) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/9780520352865 · Cited by 713
A Piece of the Pie: Blacks and White Immigrants Since 1880
Martin, W. T., & Lieberson, S. (1982) · Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie · doi:10.2307/3339903 · Cited by 667
Crosscutting Social Circles: Testing a Macrostructural Theory of Intergroup Relations
Blau, P. M., & Schwartz, J. E. (1984) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 628
Intermarriage and the Social Structure: Fact and Theory†
Merton, R. K. (1941) · Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/00332747.1941.11022354 · Cited by 528
Cited by
Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415 · Cited by 18,567
Tastes, ties, and time: a new social network dataset using Facebook.com
Lewis, K., Kaufman, J., Gonzalez, M., Wimmer, A., & Christakis, N. (2008) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2008.07.002 · Cited by 1,024
Social Boundaries and Marital Assimilation: Interpreting Trends in Racial and Ethnic Intermarriage
Qian, Z., & Lichter, D. T. (2007) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240707200104 · Cited by 616
The Growing Racial and Ethnic Divide in U.S. Marriage Patterns
Raley, R. K., Sweeney, M. M., & Wondra, D. (2015) · The Future of Children · doi:10.1353/foc.2015.0014 · Cited by 309
Gendered racial exclusion among white internet daters
Feliciano, C., Robnett, B., & Komaie, G. (2009) · Social Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2008.09.004 · Cited by 199
Metadata
- Authors
- Kalmijn, M.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Sociology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1998-08
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 395-421
- ISSN
- 0360-0572 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2115
- OpenAlex
- W2136048895
- Cited by
- 2,121
- References
- 49
- FWCI
- 9.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intermarriage and Homogamy: Causes, Patterns, Trends. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.395
- The paper
- Kalmijn, M. (1998). Intermarriage and Homogamy: Causes, Patterns, Trends. Annual Review of Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.395
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.