The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Regression Models with Ordinal Variables
Abstract
Most discussions of ordinal variables in the sociological literature debate the suitability of linear regression and structural equation methods when some variables are ordinal. Largely ignored in these discussions are methods for ordinal variables that are natural extensions of probit and logit models for dichotomous variables. If ordinal variables are discrete realizations of unmeasured continuous variables, these methods allow one to include ordinal dependent and independent variables into structural equation models in a way that (I) explicitly recognizes their ordinality, (2) avoids arbitrary assumptions about their scale, and (3) allows for analysis of continuous, dichotomous, and ordinal variables within a common statistical framework. These models rely on assumed probability distributions of the continuous variables that underly the observed ordinal variables, but these assumptions are testable. The models can be estimated using a number of commonly used statistical programs. As is illustrated by an empirical example, ordered probit and logit models, like their dichotomous counterparts, take account of the ceiling andfloor restrictions on models that include ordinal variables, whereas the linear regression model does not. Empirical social research has benefited during the past two decades from the application of structural equation models for statistical analysis and causal interpretation of multivariate relationships (e.g., Goldberger and Duncan, 1973; Bielby and Hauser, 1977). Structural equation methods have mainly been applied to problems in which variables are measured on a continuous scale, a reflection of the availability of the theories of multivariate analysis and general linear models for continuous variables. A recurring methodological issue has been how to treat variables measured on an ordinal scale when multiple regression and structural equation methods would otherwise be appropriate tools. Many articles have appeared in this journal (e.g., Bollen and Barb,
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.12.1.1 · Cited by 4,711
Logistic Regression: Why We Cannot Do What We Think We Can Do, and What We Can Do About It
Mood, C. (2010) · European Sociological Review · doi:10.1093/esr/jcp006 · Cited by 3,158
Comparing Coefficients of Nested Nonlinear Probability Models
Kohler, U., Karlson, K. B., & Holm, A. (2011) · The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata · doi:10.1177/1536867x1101100306 · Cited by 1,041
Total, Direct, and Indirect Effects in Logit and Probit Models
Breen, R., Karlson, K. B., & Holm, A. (2013) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124113494572 · Cited by 818
Analyzing ordinal data with metric models: What could possibly go wrong?
Liddell, T. M., & Kruschke, J. K. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2018.08.009 · Cited by 805
Metadata
- Authors
- Winship, C., & Mare, R. D.
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1984-08
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 512
- ISSN
- 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2132221661
- Cited by
- 796
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Regression Models with Ordinal Variables. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2095465
- The paper
- Winship, C., & Mare, R. D. (1984). Regression Models with Ordinal Variables. American Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095465
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.