The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Elite Variable in Democratic Transitions and Breakdowns
Abstract
Die Rolle von Eliten in demokratischen Transitionsprozessen und beim Zusammenbruch von Demokratien«.Stable democratic regimes depend heavily on the "consensual unity" of national elites.So long as elites remain disunified, political regimes are unstable, a condition which makes democratic transitions and democratic breakdowns merely temporary oscillations in the forms unstable regimes take.Disunity appears to be the generic condition of national elites, and disunity strongly tends to persist regardless of socioeconomic development and other changes in mass populations.The consensually unified elites that are necessary to stable democracies are created in only a few ways, two of the most important of which involve distinctive elite transformations.After elaborating this argument, we examine the relationship between elites and regimes in Western nation-states since they began to consolidate after 1500.We show that our approach makes good sense of the Western political record, that it does much to clarify prospects for stable democracies in developing societies today, and that it makes the increasingly elite-centered analysis of democratic transitions and breakdowns more systematic.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
(2005) · Cited by 3,670
Toward a Fourth Generation of Revolutionary Theory
Goldstone, J. A. (2001) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.139 · Cited by 566
Democratization and Research Methods
Coppedge, M. (2012) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139016179 · Cited by 303
Kapstein, E. B., & Converse, N. (2008) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511817809 · Cited by 149
Freyburg, T., & Richter, S. (2015) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2014.1000875 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Higley, J., & Burton, M. G.
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1989-02
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17
- ISSN
- 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2057546552
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.