The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Durkheim, Suicide, and Religion: Toward a Network Theory of Suicide
Abstract
This paper redirects debates over the religion-suicide link away from specific empirical quarrels to a consideration of Durkheim's general proposition regarding religion's protective power. We argue that his proposition must be tailored to social and historical contexts and that research must specify the underlying social mechanism at work. A consideration of historical trends leads to a more detailed specification of religions in analyses of contemporary cases, and more importantly, to an inductive elaboration of Durkheim's theoretical underpinnings. Analysis of religion's effects on United States county group suicide rates in 1970 reveals that religion continues to affect suicide rates, with Catholicism and Evangelical Protestantism tending to lower rates, and Institutional Protestantism tending to increase them. The presence of Jewish adherents produces a small but inconsistent protective effect. We attempt to account for these results first by examining a variety of standard religious typologies and second by examining evidence on whether religious affiliation reflects the operation of network ties. Finding this evidence suggestive, we move toward a network reinterpretation to clarify and elaborate Durkheim's theory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social Structure from Multiple Networks. II. Role Structures
Boorman, S. A., & White, H. C. (1976) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/226228 · Cited by 788
Cited by
Gender, marital status and the social control of health behavior
Umberson, D. (1992) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(92)90259-s · Cited by 1,357
Religious Involvement, Stress, and Mental Health: Findings from the 1995 Detroit Area Study
Ellison, C. G., Boardman, J. D., Williams, D. R., & Jackson, J. S. (2001) · Social Forces · doi:10.1353/sof.2001.0063 · Cited by 527
Religious affiliation and suicide attempt
Dervic, K., Oquendo, M. A., Grunebaum, M. F., Ellis, S., Burke, A. K., & Mann, J. J. (2004) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.161.12.2303 · Cited by 449
Religion, Disability, Depression, and the Timing of Death
Idler, E. L., & Kasl, S. V. (1992) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/229861 · Cited by 385
Wray, M., Colen, C., & Pescosolido, B. (2011) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-150058 · Cited by 358
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Pescosolido, B. A., & Georgianna, S.
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1989-02
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33
- ISSN
- 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2019257693
- Cited by
- 471
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Durkheim, Suicide, and Religion: Toward a Network Theory of Suicide. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2095660
- The paper
- Pescosolido, B. A., & Georgianna, S. (1989). Durkheim, Suicide, and Religion: Toward a Network Theory of Suicide. American Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095660
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.